Wiesel wrote of a trial that he witnessed at Aushwitz. A bunch of rabbis put God on trial for allowing the holocaust to happen. They conducted it like a real trial with attorneys, witnesses amd a judge. They ultimately found God guilty and condemned him to death. Then they recessed the court and held their normal evening prayer. Wiesel later used this event as the inspiration for his play, The Trial of God.
In another book, Wiesel wrote of his own period of atheism following the holocaust until he encountered a certain rabbi who caught Wiesel’s attention with his passion and faith. Wiesel asked him, “how can you still believe in God after what happened?”
The rabbi’s response was “How can you NOT believe in God after what happened?”
Wiesel claimed that answer turned him around and set him on the road to restoring his faith. I still don’t really understand that answer.
Wiesel himself basically claims that God is simply not all powerful and that it is up to human beings to stop evil.
Other Jewish responses I’ve seen range from the old “mysterious ways” defense to Jews not following God’s law closely enough. I don’t believe there is an “official” Jewish answer to this question. Different rabbis have different takes.
Did he? The choice to comply or not comply was still the pharoah’s decision. If God had simply gone into the pharoah’s mind and made him think “I’m going to turn everybody loose”, then he hasn’t made any choice and had no free will. The pharoahs were god kings. Maybe in addition to freeing the Israelites, it was also a lesson in humility for this ruler and the people who worshipped him as a living god. After all, Egypt was THE major power of that time, and had a god on the throne. That’s way way up on the food chain of politics.
I heard a similar story- not attribute to Wiesel- that a secular Jew asked a rabbi “After the Holocaust, how can you still believe in God?” to which the rabbi replied “After the Holocaust, how can you still believe in humanity?”
Similar to The Trial, I read NIGHT in my first year of college theology class & I found one scene to be one of the most compelling apologetics for Christ- a young boy is hanged at Auschwitz for some minor infraction & someone asks “Where is God?” to which somone replies “On the gallows.”
If God ‘hardened pharaoh’s heart’, how is that possible without affecting his free will, i.e. his decision-making capabilities?
If I hold a gun to your child’s head and tell you to do something, or else I will pull the trigger, and you go ahead and do what I say, how “free” was your decision?
Most importantly, lets not get too technical on the “free will” issue. The main point I was trying to make was that God interfered in earthly matters and made events happen that would convince someone in power (the Pharaoh) to do something good for the Jews.
And God knew exactly what would make the Pharaoh’s mind up.
So, why didn’t he do something similar with Hitler during the Holocaust?
I fail to see this as a good enough reason. It’s like a father saying “the terrorists only have half of my children, not all of them, so I won’t interfere”.
We are talking about the brutal death of 6 million of God’s followers. No matter what percent of the overall Jewish population it was, that’s still something that should have been stopped, if one was able to stop it.
So, what should the percentage be? Should G-d constantly be rescuing each and every Jew? If your answer is yes, I suggest you read one of the ‘force field’ theology threads. If your answer is no, what percentage do we have to reach before G-d should intervene?
Polerius For G-d to be guilty of sitting by and doing nothing, He’d have to exist. If G-d exists, that would tend to imply the existence of the soul and an afterlife. If we have everlasting souls, physical death becomes considerably less important. You may (for future reference note that I used the qualifier may) have a point about how the six million suffered in the camps. But, their deaths were not endings but a transition.
Re The Threshhold
So the number of Jews who must be threatened with death is more than one and less than six million.
X > 1
X < 6,000,000
Is X greater than 5? 10? Is it less than 2,000,000 ? 1,000,000?
If one believes that physical death is not important, then this whole discussion is moot, since the whole world could die and it would not matter one bit.
To have this discussion, we must assume that, for one reason or another, physical pain and death matter.
This is getting silly.
I think we can agree that the president of the U.S. should not be informed by his staff whenever 1 american dies (since people die al the time), but that he should be informed of the death of 6 million americans.
Now, where is the threshold, greater than 5? 10? Less that 2,000,000?
It doesn’t really matter. It is less than 6,000,000.
The death of the whole world would necessarily involve the death of all Jews, and thus be in violation of the covenant.
I’ll agree with you on physical pain. I’ll even throw in emotional pain as a bonus.
But I honestly believe that if I live so that the good deeds in my life outweigh my sins, then after death I shall be reunited with all my deceased friends and relatives who made the cut. My Uncle Max died just over a year ago. I believe that he now inhabits a realm of great joy and goodness. I miss his voice. I miss the smell of his cigars. I miss the antiquated slang he used. I miss his annoying habits. But, he is not gone. What we put into the ground was empty shell. It was just another house Max had moved out of.
It does matter. The Covenant twixt the Lord and Abraham was that his children would be as numerous as the stars. There are a few million of us around these days. Six million more would be nice. But, we were not wiped from the face of the Earth.
You seem to feel that Covenant has not been kept. What then do you think are the terms of the contract? If you feel G-d has not held up His end of the deal, I want to know exactly what obligations you think He has. Why do you feel He was required by the Covenant to prevent the death of six million Jews? You feel that He is not obligated to prevent the death of one Jew. Why exactly is that?
Maybe there are other reasons also. The pharoah, which many believe was Ramses the Great was for the most part an intelligent and competent ruler. In short, he may have still had some good in him, he may have still been redeemable, and most of all, he was sane. Hitler had no good in him and was almost a perfect evil and crazy as a bedbug besides. Hitler was already immune to horror and death because he ordered it. He enjoyed it. Even God won’t reason with a crazy person. (???)