I said people were having sex. I don’t want to make assumptions about your personal life, but I think it’s safe to say the overwhelming majority of people don’t associate sex with diarrhea juice.
Here is a (disconnected) link to a typical gonzo porn video, for anyone who wants to see what one is like. Obviously it is Not At All Safe For Work.
ht tp://ww w.you jizz.co m/vid eos/backyard-body-shots-turn-into-backyard-booty-shots-7225481.htmlNo diarrhea. No vomit. No eels. No miscellaneous foodstuffs. It’s two men and three women having sex by a pool in somebody’s backyard.
:eek: Google Glass for porn. Of course. Who adapts new technology faster than the porn industry. Well SirRay, I guess that will be a load off of someones shoulders. 
My SO used to get yeast infections. I assure you, it had nothing to do with the items listed in the OP.
Back to the OP: What makes you think they don’t?
Was your SO also in porn? Because that was in the thread title too, in addition to mention of yeast infections.
I don’t really get how your first sentence has a linkage to what I said. Did you think that was clever? I believe my first post is sufficiently clear. I know what scat porn is - basically people playing in poop in a porn context. I would not have clicked on the link had it said scat porn. I don’t think people puking and shitting into vaginas could be classified as scat porn. I don’t really know what to call it.
Really, the way I see it is you are the one acting out of line. Yes this is some kind of gross stuff; however, if you are not a moderator, what you are doing is junior modding. Also, it seems as if you are threads hitting because you don’t like the content. If you have rather delicate sensibilities I still can’t see why you would look at this thread. I mean it doesn’t take a high level of sophistication to know that you probably will need to brace yourself when you look at a thread with a title like this.
Does anyone here have an actual answer? Or are we just going to spend the next couple of pages discussing the fact that the OP used the wrong word, while frankly being utterly clear about what he wanted to know?
Seriously, people.
My guess I must say is that as Susan implies, they just do get infections.
“Do they get infections when they stuff their vaginas full of diarrhea juice?” :eek:-Um, yes, no shit! (clever pun not intended) .
While I don’t have a vagina, I’d say that keeping a proper hygiene after the fact would prevent most infection problems?
I know some fan fiction…
In my limited experience with poo - which has all been deposited, unused by any ladies for sexual pleasure, in an appropriate receptacle - and having seen a few of these porn clips, I think that the act is normally faked with chocolate pudding or similar.
There is just too much quantity - normal people do not save up a couple of litres of diarrhea, whereas it would be possible to introduce it via enema shortly before the shoot.
I’m sure the vomit porn is similarly recently eaten food - so in both cases quite fresh and palatable before being ingested/introduced. This would reduce the infection risk - the volume of “clean” material would be greater than the “dirty” - and I’m also of the belief that most people would douche their asses before introducing something they expect to be later eaten/stuck in a vagina.
And finally, even if you are terribly into sticking weird things into your vagina and filming it; you probably want to continue to use that same vagina for the same purpose later - so you are going to clean and take care of it.
Even so - the live fish and octopi in some Japanese porn does seem somewhat unwise.
Italics added.
This porn of which you speak: except for a brief surfacing into YouTube as a prank fad of the video referred to as “Two Girls, One Cup” [its original name? Doubtful], I’m afraid you are naive. In all honesty, these films are not made to be talked about–exactly the opposite, in fact, except among co-fanciers. They are made either for people to masturbate to or as records of sexual pleasure by couples or single adults which are posted for any number of reasons, among them the surety, or hope, that they will be used as a stimulus in masturbation.
And one man’s mediocre video is another’s great find, I daresay.
I refer you to the videos page and subject area list, w%w ero$& p rofile . communist . [NSFW]
I think this is a great username/post combo.
i’m sure all involved are concerned about safety. people are hosed down before and after.
There was an article several years ago by a woman who claimed to have grown up with hippie parents in a free love household. She discussed the downside of a lifestyle where she had learned that if men want it, give it to them. One interesting thing she learned was that many of her friends’ fathers wanted sex if they managed to get alone with her. The other thing I remember from the article was that the downside of “free love” was very frequent vaginal infections.
(This was a serious magazine, Rolling Stone or Atlantic or New Yorker something like that)
So I suspect the answer to the OP’s question is - they don’t avoid the infections.
You are obviously not a woman.
Huh huh, you said “load”.
I assume too that someone who is desperate enough to shove objects and objectionable stuff into body cavities, live on camera, probably is desperate enough to ignore the health consequences. Plus as long as the problem can be covered up (washing, not bleeding, etc.) then they can probably keep working through it all.
If you’re spaced out on narcotics would you even notice severe itching, or do you just think it’s more of the purple spiders crawling all over you?
(There, is that gross enough?)