Well, just a little insight, this question (and it’s a poll from what I gather, so I put it in this forum) was instigated by this thread, and a couple of others that garnered my curiosity: I’m wondering of the legal procedures of which one goes about purchasing a firearm (both a longarm and sidearm) in your locality.
The history:
As I was growing up in New Jersey, the law was that one had to obtain a firearm permit to purchase guns. A ‘longarm permit’ was good for life, and good for as many rifles and shotguns as you cared to buy. A ‘handgun permit’ was good for 90 days on the date of issue from the issuing authority (IIRC, the state police) and was only good for one pistol/revolver.
When I went to college, and after that, joined the Air Force, I changed residency of different states, and they all had different requirements. Since I left New Jersey, North Dakota and Montana only required ‘proof of residency’ and a five minute phone call to the NCIC, granting a quick background check to allow me to purchase any firearm. No permits, no questions, no waiting period. So long as I had a photo ID and a cash/credit card, I could walk away with a new .357 Magnum with my father, as I did within 15 minutes the Tuesday before Thanksgiving of this year (talk about “splurge shopping”!! ).
The question:
I know different countries have different systems, and I once talked to a couple of Canadians about their laws. Apparently, you guys have to apply for a national firearms card to purchase a single firearm. Britian, I have no idea. Australia, I have no idea. Ohio, California, Flordia, Barbados, I have no idea.
I’m simply curious on the legal differences between the states/nations.
So, if you wanted to buy a li’l plinker to knock over tin cans, how does your jurisdiction require you to jump through the hoops?
Tripler
It’s a poll, and I’m genuinely curious.
[sub]Mods, you reserve that right to do what you do . . .[/sub]