Oddly it wasn’t the bullshit he spewed, it was the petty way he implied that the new NATO center was too expensive. Check out the 7 minute mark of this.
“I never asked how much it cost.”
Nancy Pelosi is pissed off because President Trump isn’t visiting foreign countries in alphabetical order.
I can’t tell if she’s off her meds, or is mixing her meds with booze.
@18:18 time stamp
Did they at least leave a big tip?
I think you’re in the wrong thread. Try the Stupid Liberal Idea Of The Day.
I watched that exchange just now. Characterizing it as “Nancy Pelosi is pissed off because President Trump isn’t visiting foreign countries in alphabetical order” is somewhat misleading. In the course of questioning why Trump would visit Saudi Arabia before visiting our close allies like Canada, Pelosi made an offhand remark, “it wasn’t even alphabetical”. This was a snide way of saying, “you’re not visiting our closest allies first, and I guess you’re not going in alphabetical order, so what’s the deal?” It was somewhat clumsily worded (it was, after all, an extemporaneous answer to a complicated question, and not everyone has Trump’s gift for extemporaneous speaking). But in no way could it be honestly interpreted as “Nancy Pelosi is pissed off because President Trump isn’t visiting foreign countries in alphabetical order.”
Somewhat clumsily worded? What did she even mean by alphabetical order? “Alphabetical” and “Close allies” are not at all synonymous.
And how was this a complicated question:
::shrug:: Take it how you like.
She was being snide. What she meant was “What were you thinking, dolt?”
We don’t have to go back and forth about whether or not her comment was “clumsy” or “snide”, but what about your claim that she was answering a complicated question?
“What are your impressions about…” doesn’t seem complicated, to me.
It’s like the kind of joking that Trump’s surrogates always say he is doing.
Seriously, though, do you really not understand the sentiment of asking wondering why he would go to Saudi Arabia first. She was speculating on the reasons.
-It’s not because they are our most loyal allies
-It’s not because he was going in alphabetical order
Why visit them first, then.
Who cares? It doesn’t change the fact Trump’s the biggest fucking moron in the room. Any room. And you fucking voted for him.
Simple travel planning. If he was going to the NATO meeting anyway, and decided to extend an overseas trip, it makes sense to go to the farthest away country first, and work your way back.
Hence, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Italy, Belgium, back to D.C.
There doesn’t have to be some nefarious purpose for arranging the President’s schedule in this manner.
Nefarious? Probably not. I refer to and am guided by Trump’s Razor:
“When seeking an explanation for the behavior of President Donald J. Trump, always choose the stupidest possible explanation.”
A stupid person could. D’Anconia, back me up here.
Ah, the eternal Republican motive quandary : evil or stupid ? Por qué no los dos ?
On this trip, has he signed/agreed to any other multi-billion-dollar deals? Don’t think so, off the top of my head. Money deals first, put NATO at the back of the line to show 'em who’s who? (might have misremembered order of visits) :rolleyes:
Jared signed a Saudi deal right before the trip, if I am remembering correctly. Even if I am not, NATO at the back of the line squares neatly with his teeny little brain.
That’s not at all what she was saying, but of course you’re going to want to try to spin it that way.
Lemme write that down…