That’s not much of a difference, The Simpsons just had some restraint and writers who could make jokes without spoofing old TV shows.
I think the problem with the newscaster thing is the way whole bean phrased it. A better comparison of Kent Brockman and Tom Tucker might be “self-important, frequently incorrect newscasters whose personal flaws are frequently displayed on air.” There may be tons of similar newscasters in sitcom history, but as a younger TV viewer I couldn’t name one off the top of my head. The exposition thing doesn’t seem novel to me.
not exactly the same, but Seinfeld uses news programs quite a bit - when George was mistaken for the white supremacist at MSG, when Kramer was accused of murder in LA, when Kramer was Steve Gundason’s driver (reminiscent of AJ Cowlings & OJ Simpson), and in the finale, where their trial was covered by Geraldo. Granted, they aren’t recurring characters.
I enjoy both The Simpsons and Family Guy, and I wouldn’t draw a lot of parallels between the shows. Besides the dumb dad stereotype. Both the kids in FG, for instance, are sort of losers. Bart and Lisa can be argued to be heroic characters for the most part. Marge and Lois couldn’t be more different. Marge is pretty much to the straight and narrow, while Lois maintains that facade but is all too willing to lapse into morally murky areas (smoking pot, giving her number to a successful monkey, bragging about sleeping with a Black man, etc.)
…I have never gotten the impression that any of those cutaways are supposed to represent reality in the FG universe. I think they are intended to be gags and that’s it.
I think that’s a fundamental difference in the Simpsons and Family Guy. Simpsons is about the jokes service the plot. FG is the opposite.
Anyone with more than a passing familiarity with either show would know that I was. “Recurring” was implied by the context, not specifically stated, and as has been mentioned, that was a problem in my phrasing. That doesn’t change the fact that anyone who watches either show with any frequency would have known what I was referring to (i.e. Tom Tucker=Kent Brockman). The Dinosaurs comment cements this for me, as that was also a rip off of The Simpsons.
CandidGamera,your being obtuse and it’s annoying. First, “name five others” was offered in response the following text quoted from you, " The evening news program as exposition is a common sitcom device." You clearly have some familiarity with the shows and should know that recurring was implied. If you didn’t then, you do now, and your examples are no longer relevant. Again, name five (please don’t make me spell out five “what”). Can’t? Didn’t think so.
As for the hostility to you perceive in me, let me assure you, your perception is flawed. I enjoy Family Guy. I think it’s got some strong elements. I was just acknowledging the rip offs. Would you stand to defend the Flintstones if someone had the audacity to accuse the show of ripping of the Honeymooners? After all, Fred didn’t drive a bus, he operated a dinosaur.
My honest initial reading of the ‘name five others’ was ‘name five other common sitcom devices’, so, stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
“Recurring” is not an essential characteristic here - the number of times something occurs is irrelevant to its nature.
The two shows use the news device differently - the joke in Family Guy is not Tom Tucker’s cowardice and willingness to jump to conclusions, as it is with Kent Brockman, but his often contentious interactions with his co-anchor. I suppose it would shock you to learn that Kent Brockman doesn’t have a co-anchor. Or a news team of any sort, apart from the traffic reporter, Arnie.
Of the ones I listed, I would consider the device ‘recurring’ in all but Drawn Together. We can add in Married With Children, and MASH thanks to D_Odds, and hey, why not throw in The Flintstones, since they’ve been mentioned?
Would you stand to defend the Simpsons if someone had the audacity to accuse the show of ripping off the Flintstones? As has been repeatedly acknowledged by the Simpsons writers?
The Simpsons and Family Guy have no more similarities than two sitcoms would be expected to have.
As for your denial of hostility towards the show - I think your initial snide response to me puts the lie to that.
You’re killing me. That reads, “I don’t understand things easily, so screw you!”
You know, at first, I thought you were being “intentionally” obtuse, but maybe not. Of course the fact that Brockman and Tucker are named characters who are continually used to move and often partcipate in the story matters. It IS the similarity. There are to many examples to list of single or minor uses of news porgrams as exposition. Seriously man?
No, as I mention in the OP (the damn OP), I am aware that there is a tradittion of borrowing. I would acknowledge it.
Heh, just heh.
Dude, my “intial snide response” was to you, not the show.
actually, I think they are. They’re generally introduced with lines like "like the time I . . . " or “I know how it feels to be surprised, I’ve been surprised before . . . .”
Didn’t South Park cover the part about with nearly 400 Simpsons episodes, that they have done every possible cartoon plot there is, multiple times over, and that any cartoon after it by default will be doing a plot the Simpsons did?
And as for the family similarties- other than Peter/Homer, there are none. Marge is nothing like Lois, Bart is a brat, Chris is a nebbish, Lisa a brain, Meg a wallflower, Stewie talks, Maggie doesn’t, and no wino dog on the Simpsons, also, no honry neighbor, papraplegic neighbor, or black neighbor. Burns is a tyrant, Mr. Weed is not, etc, etc.
Married with Children did use news as exposition often enough to be noticable, and late in their run added a recurring newscaster, Miranda Veracruz de la Jolla Cardinal.
While I haven’t seen all that many episodes of the serie’s episodes, I also recall Coach using news and, of course, sports talk shows regularly. Can’t recall if the sports talk show hosts were recurring characters or not.
drat . . . my cover is blown. Let it not go unsaid that Family Guy is, without a doubt, the worst ripoff ever. Rest assured, I will be on the internet, registering my disgust throughout the world.
. . . and Homer’s pants are blue and Peters are green. Green!!!
Quit looking for “non-matches” as they are irrelevant. I’ve never said the shows were clones of one another and even if they were, at heart, differences would still be easy to find.
