[QUOTE=DianaG]
Assuming that you and your partner are being über-careful, have been tested for all the major sexually transmitted diseases, and come up clean, why on earth would you ask any of that other stuff? Seriously, what exactly do you hope to accomplish here?
[/QUOTE]
Why is it always women with a lot of former sexual partners saying this?
Okay, everyone excuse the sexual “double standards” I’m about to throw out, and even the greater sin here on The Dope, arguing from evolutionary psychology, but I also beg that we avoid any claims of misogyny because I really don’t think that I am. If women wish to apply the same rule to men, I’m not going to object.
Okay, let’s start with all of the “objective” reasons to be concerned about the number of past partners like STD’s. Let’s face it, STD’s are a stochastic event and even someone with just one previous sexual partner could have HPV, crabs, chlamydia, and syphillis, but it’s a lot more likely with someone with multiple sexual partners. Okay, so the crabs etc. aren’t a wholly fatal concern, and I suppose that one really ought to wait for a recent negative HIV test prior to sleeping with anyone but who’s realisicly going to ask for or be able to provide a negative HPV test?
Okay, moving on to the less objective reasons. I know that I am going to have a fair amount of, “investment” with anyone that I choose to sleep with or at least I would like that. Drunken sex or random sex or one night stands really don’t appeal to me. I would encourage anyone to tell me with a straight face that a 25 year old with 40+ prior sexual partners will take sex as seriously as someone with three prior partners. I might view any act as having a moderate level of commitment attached while I doubt that a person with a large number of past partners will attach the same level of commitment. I’m not saying one is better than the other, but it’s my body, I get to choose my sexual partners, and it’s what I want. So nobody get all huffy about how I’m judging people.
Finally, let’s move on to the most nebulous but pervasive point for me. This is also where we invoke the (horror) evolutionary psychology. It should be, I think, pretty obvious from that standpoint that a woman with a lot fewer sexual partners is much more attractive than someone with five dozen prior sexual partners. And what can I say, I’m a guy, and that’s the way it works in my head. I fantasize about virgins and there’s a certain je ne sais quoi for women that I know that have had 0-5 past partners as opposed to 12 in one year. Let me promise you that my attraction to a woman decreased about 15 fold after learning that she had had 12 partners in one year. Again, I’m not judging that behavior from a social standpoint or saying she’s a bad person, but from a personal attraction standpoint, “bleeeah.”
Point being, I don’t respect people with a lot of prior partners any less as people, but I know for me at least, an inordinately high number of ex-partners does make them significantly less attractive to me.
To answer the OP directly:
- 4
- 8
- Cannot think of any off the top of my head
- See rest of post
- N/A
- No, I haven’t