More accurately, “Purported photo of Cecil Adams”. (It’s my web page, so I should know)
I saw that one too on Google, but if you read the text its questionable as to who the photo is really of.
So how about it Mr. Adams? Can we get a glimpse of a verified photo? I’m sure everyone would be willing to share if you do.
I just ran a google images search for Cecil Adams. I got the picture of Ed & his kid, Schroedinger, an empty chair, a drawing of a robot, a battleship.
I know this is gonna get me in a lot of trouble, but since the first column I read, about 1981, I always pictured a Robert Crumb self-portrait talking when I read The Straight Dope.
Ask me, if you need help with those negative exponents.
::In Green M&Ms voice::
“He does exist!”
I’ve been thinking, and I’ve realized a strange connection exists here. Follow me for a minute: Cecil Adams, the man knows everything, right? Right. How could this be? We could take the “logical” route and assume that he actually “learned” in school and other educational establishments.
Psssttt, I say. I prefer the supernatural, no facts needed, highly psuedo-approach. As I stated earlier, he is Obviously an ancient vampire. “Perfect Master”, indeed. Gee what sort of people use this name…Vampires. Plain and simple. A “Master” vampire would have lot’s of “assistants” who do his bidding. I think we can check off that in the “Cecil has” column. Another interesting thing is the lack of photo’s, which I mentioned earlier-CLEARLY evidence that no picture could be taken. If you are indeed a vampire (and an ancient one at that), it would explain your vast amounts of knowledge. After all you would have lived through history and you would’ve picked up quite a bit along the way.
Also, I noticed that you didn’t clear up the matter of your age at all; instead you choose to steer the conversation away from your age. This could be because you would have a hard time explaining how you are 6000+ years old without revealing you are an immortal vampire.
Cecil, you’ve got some explaining to do , don’t worry, we won’t reveal your presence to Buffy…
Cecil is ageless. Cecil is timeless. How can the Perfect Master be otherwise?
Nah, not authors of inane and pointless letters. I’m thinking more along the lines of “Oh, so this is what they do with banned posters!”
You know, that’s a startlingly good point…
I’ve been trying to get a figure on “who” Cecil is, and I think my vampire theory has merit…
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=154918&highlight=Cecil
In this thread, I mentioned he might have been a “Matrix”-type person, thus explaining his intelligence (it was downloaded).
In this thread, I speculated that he was actually an android. I mean, it does fit the facts. Once again, knowledge could have been downloaded.
But Cecil didn’t show in either thread. He showed in this one. This leads me to believe that I have secretly cracked the mystery that is “Adams”…Yes…that must be it…
By what logic is someone born in 1964 considered a baby boomer?
By what logic is someone born in 1964 considered a baby boomer?
By what logic is someone born in 1964 considered a baby boomer?
Once…
Twice…
Three times a poster…
Are not the boomers those born between 1946 and 1964? I’d assumed that that includes those born in '46 and in '64. Easy to remember: began in 46, ran through 64 (46 reversed).
If I might ask off topic quesitons… After the boomers came Gen X, presumably born 65 through ?? – what birth year marks the end of Gen X? And what do we call the post-Gen X gen?
I was always under the impression that the “Baby Boomers” were kids that were born as a direct result of their dads coming home from WWII and being so excited to see their moms that the first thing they did was get her pregnant. I also remember back in 1995 there were tons of news articles and magazine covers that said “Baby Boomers Turn 50.”
19 years is a hell of a long time to wait for “I’m glad you’re not dead so let’s have sex” sex.
Well I’ll be damned – the Boss does read GQ from time to time.
How 'bout helping with a question from time to time, big guy?
:eek:
HE’S HERE! Quick! Everybody look busy!
Source: http://www.unt.edu/cpe/module1/deffile/def7-02.htm
Source: http://research.aarp.org/econ/boomer_seg_1.html
Yeah, well my post doesn’t specifically address the OP, but how often can one be part of the Perfect Master’s thread, eh?
Chandeleur, does this qualify as looking busy?
:eek:
Hot damn! I summoned the Perfect Master!
[sub]Does this make me an Official Doper™ yet? Am I part of the clique? Do I get a coffee mug? Anything?
hmm… maybe I should go make a sig line or something…[/sub]
1946 through 1964…that puts me & my mother in the same generation.
Depends on who you ask.
Fortune.com makes reference to 1966 - 1975, which would overlap with the babyboomer generation. However, other assorted sites make passing reference to the years 1961 - 1981; 1964 - 1981 (caution: PDF);1963-1977; and 1965 - 1980.
The American Heritage Dictionary tells us the expression originates from the Douglass Coupland* novel “Generation X” and means:**
**Commonly, the generation following Gen X is imaginatively named “Generation Y”. (Generation “Why?”, for the witty.)
(And “Generation neXt” for fans of Pepsi and the Spice Girls. ;))
- Isn’t it “Copeland”?