I wasn’t trying to shit on it or you, but I can see how you read it that way; I should have been more clear and apologize for not doing so. When I spoke of men objecting out of ego, I was referring to those who respond vehemently to the notion of their wives retaining their birth names, not to your situation. (You object to your wife changing your mutual son’s last name years after his birth, yes?)
Ok, damn. Sorry then, ‘the guy’ seemed pointed rather than generic.
Let the civility resume!
I agree that men who object to their wives keeping their own names are dicks.
No need no apologize. The fault was mine for not making myself clear; your interpretation of what I wrote was reasonable.
[Aslan]
Here in Narnia, young prince, we deal in courteous language or hard knocks: nothing in between.
[/aslan]
Skald the Rhymer
[Aslan]
Here in Narnia, young prince, we deal in courteous language or hard knocks: nothing in between.
[/aslan]
[/QUOTE]
You can just call me Peter.
Update: She has decided instead to make her name a non-hyphenated (is it ironic that that was hyphenated?) second middle name.
I sent her the link to this thread yesterday…don’t know if that had anything to do with it…
She’s going to change her name to a non hyphenated name, but your son’s name to a hyphenated name? Or did you mean “his”, in reference to your son, instead of “her”?
ETA: I think you mean that you son’s name will change from Billy Tom Ate to Billy Tom Nines Ate as opposed to Billy Tom Nines-Ate.
Dang, yes. Lemme rephrase: She has decided instead that she would like to add her name to my son’s, as basically a second middle name.
You can just call me Peter.
[/quote]
Silly rabbit. Peter was never a prince.
Silly rabbit. Peter was never a prince.
[/QUOTE]
Damn. King, wasn’t he.
That sounds like a reasonable compromise that will make everyone as comfortable with as possible with his/her individual desire. Good for both of you.