I would vote for a new state of Sur de California.
Given my childhood upbringing, I’m somewhat partial to the state of South Central California.
I, too, am passionately opposed to the proposed new state of South Carolina.
I am mildly adverse to South Dakota.
Which would be two states north of Baja California Sur
But what’s your position on East Dakota and The Third Virgina from the Left?
Frisco Del Cal and Really North California.
Well, South California just sounds wrong anyway. Sounds too much like South Carolina. It should be called Southern California, like it already is.
I propose an Expedition to the East Pole.
<poses heroically>
Who’s with me, lads?!
Really North California is called Jefferson.
I would like to see North Virginia, East Pennsylvania, South New Jersey, East Texas, And East-Central Alaska.
This message posted from Virginia Beach, East Virginia
Considering the fiscal state of things, I wish either North Dakota or South Dakota would assimilate Minnesota…
East Dakota!
Instead of “South California”, I think we should be called “Roscoe’s Chicken And Waffles”.
We southern Oregonians are miffed at being excluded from your statement.
Besides, North Dakota is really South Saskatchewan.
I apologize and amend my statement:
Really North California and Really South Oregon are collectively called Jefferson. Jefferson would actually get get my vote for 51st state should there be a vote.
I’m sorry, but the name South Saskatchewan is taken. It starts in Alberta.
If we are going to add a state, we need to add at least 5 more states. How would we arrange 51 stars on the flag?
Can we call ourselves “West Arizona” instead?
New Quakendrought?
Lalaland?
Delusion?