Foxy40 sure is a mystery. In one thread she complains about her soon-to-be ex-husband and how she’s sick of having to support his lazy ass and how unfair the courts are…and then months later flippantly tosses out that she recently tried to get back together with him and it failed. Huh?
In another thread her co-workers try to steal money from her, then later she brushes it off as no big deal. And finally, her son commits grand larceny against her.
In each thread, she’s in the center of a drama that revolves around…money. You know what my grandma used to say? “Honey, beware of people who are always in the middle of a drama. Cause if it don’t find them, they’ll create one.”
Foxy, you really do have serious money and trust issues. You need to fix yourself before you can ever hope to fix your son.
Her son would never think that. He might think “Mom is whining again about that money that I had every right in the world to take…yawn…her redundancy is boring.”
I think he sounds like a fine young American, already well accustomed to consuming things he can’t afford out of vanity and greed.
I figure in about 15 years he can have a mortgage he can’t afford. He’s probably borrowed against his equity to buy a jet ski, a home theater system, and an SUV.
I’d be LESS concerned if the kid was addicted to drugs.
Ahhhh you are correct. Thank You for correcting my error.
I think you are fooling yourself here. There is no way a 19 year old person thinks that slipping a $20 out of your parents purse or wallet is the same thing as stealing credit cards and checks.
No, no, no.
Even if he had no clue about how credit cards work with payments or interest he knew that what he was doing was wrong. He proved that by hiding the statements.
You reported as such to who? Do you have servants or something?
You said you found out about the “theft” after a call from your credit card company so you did not report it missing to your son.
It sounds like he stole several checks in the middle of the check book but they must have passed through and where paid with out her knowledge. Then he stole an entire pack and at least used one which in turn bounced.
Since the bounced check was from a pack she reported stolen would the bank not inform the police and give them the name that the check was made out to?
Don’t banks try to prosecute for stuff like that? Does a bank or the law for that matter not consider that fraud?
If you tell the bank there is a missing book of checks, and to stop payment of any not cashed, I doubt there will be any prosecution. Why should they care? They aren’t out of pocket.
It seems one check from the book was cashed, and bounced. Foxy made good on that check. Were other checks to be showing up, the bank might be interested.
You continue to make excuses for his behavior. No one with a functioning brain stem thinks systematically stealing and maxing out a series of credit cards, and then moving on to checks, to the tune of $2500 in six weeks, is the same as taking $20 for the movies.
The only way you can defend his behavior is by painting him as too stupid to be outside without a helmet and an escort. You do him no favors by infantilizing him in this way. If you want him to act like an adult, treat him like one. But I should probably save my breath; you have solicited advice but it’s clear you have no intention of taking it. Which, y’know, fine. Best of luck to you both.
Either the kid is (how did Jodi put it…escort and helmet?) or
he is addicted to having stuff. To spending money. To relative wealth and privledge. And that is as much an addiction - and as much a problematic addiction - as drugs or alcohol. It won’t ruin your liver, but it will leave you broke and broken and alone. It can set up a gambling addiction or criminal behavior (oh, wait, we are already there).
or
He’s already just a crook.
Foxy seems to think its door number 2 - and that seems not unlikely for a kid who has a trust fund and a mom who seems to have spoiled him rotten and who has significant money issues herself (e.g. five sets of china). But I wouldn’t brush that off as “well, it isn’t drugs!” because a spending addiction is still an addiction.
In a sense that stolen $20 is the moral equivalent of $2500. Because it’s stolen. And if stealing itself doesn’t matter, why would the amount make any difference?
I saw a clip from The Osbournes where Ozzy was basically telling Kelly the same thing, but he stated something like: “As long as you live here and I pay your medical bills, I own your vagina.”
I betcha Vanessa Huxtable never got it put quite that way, which is ironic, with Cliff being a OB/GYN.
Fair enough. I’m going to go ahead and close this. Anyone who wants to continue to discuss any issues that came up during the course of the thread is welcome to start a new one.