[QUOTE=Skara_Brae]
I did not know this…Interesting!
[/QUOTE]
I thought it was interesting, too. I joined the liturgy committee at my parish a few years ago, and was amazed to find out how much I DIDN’T know about the mass, despite having attended what seems like millions of them in my lifetime. The thing that was most interesting was stuff that isn’t supposed to be done, that is often added in. For instance…
When I joined the committee, it was when the church was in the process of adding a couple of things to the General Instruction that weren’t in there before. One of them was a universal sign of respect to the Host, which is that small bow/head nod that they added. From what I heard, it was in response to this situation, where some people are genuflecting, some people are doing the sign of the cross, etc. This gives one thing that everyone does (and doesn’t slow down the Communion line, I suppose…not that this should necessarily be a consideration, but if it wasn’t we’d probably still have communion rails!)
This is the one that just irritates me to no end. Not only is this practice of holding hands NOT in the General Instruction, but the Bishops have put out a letter saying that it’s not supposed to be done. A lot of people like it, though, and my experience is that these liturgy committees like the one I was on tend to take liberties with what it says in the General Instruction. Once it starts catching on in a parish, or if there’s a priest who likes to do it (at one parish I sometimes attend, the priest actually instructs everyone to hold hands), it’s hard to shake it. I’m with you…ugh!
[QUOTE=Sanders]
Actually, the priest isn’t supposed to say that, because he doesn’t know the person really is in a better place
[/QUOTE]
That is true…
[QUOTE=Musicat]
The (a casket) quip was my addition. But the priest seemed sure she had joined her loving husband who predeceased her by a few months and they were together again. No one disputed his claim.
How sure? Pretty darn.
[/QUOTE]
In Catholic theology, it’s assumed that the person is in purgatory for an indefinite length of time, unless the Church has canonized that person as a saint. That’s why it’s inappropriate for the priest (or anyone else) to make the statement that the person is in a better place/in heaven/etc. The Church has gotten a little touchy-feely, and likes to say things like that to make people feel better, but you’re not supposed to. And certainly, if the priest says it, no one is going to contradict it.