The Illustrious Super Kapowzler asks about allusions to fictional characters use of marijuana and vomits forth:
:dubious::eek::(:mad:
Q.E.D. bitches
Now I’m all for a bit of frivolity around here, but you’ve raised being mundane, pointless and needlessly esoteric to an art form. And its bad art, like someone haivng once seen a Jackson Pollock painting and saying wow, I can do that, I’m awesome. Despite an exhaustive search, I have yet to find anything you’re posted approaching amusing or informative. It seems with each new post, you’re on a pre-determined curve of gibberish asymptotically approaching characters typed at random. And would it kill you to add something to a topic started by others once in a while? We’re not here to talk about what you want to talk about all the time.
You departure, as inevitable as it seems, is nonetheless eagerly awaited by many, if I may presume to speak for them.
Look, you people took my Wildest Bill, then you took my VC03 - I will fight you to the death over taking my Super Kapowzler away from me, capiche?* No, he doesn’t post incredibly dense, completely incomprehensible academic treatises like collounsbury who I assume was getting paid by the twenty-five cent word, but he entertains me, goddammit! Which is more than I can say for a whole bunch of Great Debates-squatting, post-parsing pedants.
Same here. His screen name is awesome, and although he’s got the potential to be annoying in large doses, at least he’s generally not frucking up other peoples’ threads with his gibberish.
And shit.