And I’ve reported his latest post in that thread:
Flat out wrong and I hope something that is not allowed by the mods.
And I’ve reported his latest post in that thread:
Flat out wrong and I hope something that is not allowed by the mods.
Been here only since '16 - wondering if anyone this poopular* has been around as long as him.
ETA: meant that footnote to be tiny, but I guess discourse has done away with that function.
Shodan had a long run being hated on.
Such a shame, such a shame.
(Really, such a shame.)
WHAT?!
ETA:
pardon the ATMBosity here…
I did “<”, then “small”, then “>”, then “WHAT?!”, then “<”, then “/small”, then “>”
ETA II: I corrected the /small
It takes just a <small>
effort to do it.
But a larger effort to type in between opening and closing tags!
Dear lord, I fear the good Dr’s posting privileges are threatened by his inability to . . . do grade school math.
And here I thought spelling would be his Achilles’ heel!
Putting a space after the asterisk* has Discourse believe you want to make a list.
*Don’t do that.
Ah, thanks.
I’m late to the party on this, but…
And in other fun Deth news, he quite literally and unironically posted this in the 2028 Dem Frontrunner thread: “Joe Biden didnt run in 2024. Harris did.”
Damn, so many typos on those Biden 2024 signs and stickers.
Yes, DrDeth, we know that you think the Democratic election loss was due to the high rate of inflation. By your standards, that’s not an outlandish assertion, but do you really have to make it multiple times in every single election-related thread?!
But that’s his whole schtick. Repeat ad nauseum the same tired points (to be fair, different tired points depending on topic!) repeatedly and oblivious to context and immune to any new information - whether supportive of his overall point or, much more commonly, totally contradictory to his point.
Get rid of that, and what’s left?
Yeah, you can even cite it (it is well-documented), but that doesn’t mean you should. Not everywhere all the time. That’s basically spamming.
Now he’s in the "Myths That Form About Songs" thread, doubling down on the assertion that “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds” is NOT about drugs! Fortunately not many people are taking the bait.
Eh, I’m with him on that. When the Beatles wanted to make a song about drugs, they explicitly admitted it. And the original drawing does exist.
Were they on drugs when they wrote it? Yeah, probably, and that probably accounts for a lot of the weird imagery. But that doesn’t mean the song is about drugs.
A poster can be correct and still be trolling.
So you think it’s a total coincidence that the capitalized letters in the title spell “LSD”?