Fair enough. Willfully obtuse it is.
Can I get some of what you’re on? It must be one hell of a good hallicinogen to see what you’re reading to come up with that interpretation.
How convenient.
Perhaps I think you’re being…less than honest with us (I sure hope that one is okay, Twickster). The fact that you’re accusing people of not “believing in parking lots” and other such nonsense supports this theory.
[QUOTE=benangmo]
You know something - a while back Ambivalid put out a call for people to come and “help” him on this site. I am beginning to wonder if you answered his call.
[/QUOTE]
Okay. I’m assuming the moderators here are okay with people making accusations like this but let me be very clear: no. I am such a fucking nutcase that, unlike you, I believe in the myth of parking lots, and I also don’t need to be “summoned” from some other community in order to suggest that perhaps it’s not relevant if a guy rolling around in a wheelchair was mouthy or whatever when someone assaulted him. I get that that is an uncommon attitude around here. I’m sticking with it. I bet I’m in the majority on this point, and I have moral certainty that I’m right about it.
[QUOTE=benangmo]
In this life, it is a rather universal fact that no matter who or what you are, where you go, what you do and what colour your hair is there will be people that are infriging your rights, inconveniencing you, acting against proper social mores to your detriment (whatever way you want to define it)
[/QUOTE]
And yet in no normally functioning segment of society would anyone ask if the problem was that you were going around being “confrontational” about being a woman or a queer or a disabled person or a black person or a Jew or a Gypsy when evaluating the circumstances of an assault. Because it would be completely irrelevant.
Everyone has the right to be confrontational. No one has the right to assault anyone. Period.
The fact that some people feel a special right to assault someone, as though they won’t face consequences – perhaps confident that they won’t face consequences, because their victim is a queer or a woman or a person using a fucking wheelchair is entirely, in civilized society if perhaps not here, an indictment of the miserable character of the person who struck someone they thought couldn’t respond. The fact that some of us have to take special care to avoid being physically attacked is not okay and the whole point is that no one should have to. Not that certain types of people should learn to keep our mouths shut because certain other types of people are more likely to attack us if we don’t.
If you had a relevant and worthwhile point, you would be willing to direct your ire on the nutbag who things parking lots don’t exist, not on the nutbag who thinks they do.
(bolding mine)
Ok, I wanted to stay out of this ‘bringing up the past’ crap but you have made some errors here that need correcting.
The first bolded segment was a complete joke and I cannot believe you even remember that. I am glad I make such an impression. 
The second bolded segment is simply wrong. I blocked that guy in (after repeated refusals to leave) only to go retrieve the security guard; no police were involved in the ordeal whatsoever.
*and that person you say had every right to be in that handicap spot never did display any placard/permit, so they did NOT have every right to be there. All that was done was the passenger momentarily pulled out and flashed a placard from the glove box. It very well could have the passenger’s placard; who didn’t leave the car (and this is the likely scenario as the passenger was an elderly lady).
Now I’m curious - can you point to where I said that parking lots don’t exist? I am really wondering if I wrote something weird, that I don’t remember, or if maybe I have had a “Hal Briston” moment…
TWEEEEEEET!
Cut the heated posts out right now. A few of you are within a hair’s breadth away from getting a warning.
Beyond this post, drop the hijack and disguised insults/sarcasm.
Anyone who continues the hijack after this post may be subject to a warning.
For the third and last time–start a thread in the pit if you want to insult anyone or take them to town about what they’re posting.
Someone with a disabled parking permit cannot park in a disabled spot?
And you are confrontational enough to block people in with you car…
Yep - that helps your case a lot…
I’m sorry. Do you honestly not believe that disabled people are disproportionately likely to be the victims of violent crimes? I honestly would not have thought that that point would be considered quite so implausible. In general, people who are less physically capable than average of defending themselves are more likely to be the targets of violence: physically disabled people, women, the elderly, children.
It honestly had not occurred to me that people would be skeptical of that point. And sorry, but if you are skeptical, you obviously want scholarly sources to convince you – I mean, you certainly wouldn’t be convinced by something I Google up for you. And I don’t have JStor, or ProQuest, or WestLaw, or Lexis-Nexis, or other things like that at home, where I am liable to be posting here.
And to be quite honest, in my evaluation, someone who needs a basic fact like this explained to them is probably just being intransigent and unwilling to accept a point that is obvious or well-known, and I’m definitely not going to spend my working hours finding a list of citations that will undoubtedly result in more ‘skepticism’. I’d rather continue having working hours and access to Lexis-Nexis than prove a point to someone who is most likely trying very hard not to believe something obvious.
Well, the person who complained that the layout with the curb-cuts and whatnot is inconceivable could only believe that parking lots don’t exist. Or I mean they could have been making up bullshit to support their point. Because their point is bullshit.
Or they believe parking lots don’t exist. Your choice.
Idle question - any reason this thread can’t be moved to the pit, it that’s the tone that is evolving?
Accessible parking spaces do not, magically, have access to private curb-cuts.
In parking lots.
Which of course you don’t believe in.
Can you specify who is violating the rules? Because my ardent belief in parking lots doesn’t seem like it would be against the rules but honestly after reading this thread I’m kind of doubting what the rules here say.
There’s no reason you can’t create a Pit thread based on posts in this thread, just like many posters have done the many times before you.
I’m giving some of you the benefit of the doubt that you posted before seeing my last post.
It ends here.
Can you rephrase - I’m totally “catching no balls” with what you’re saying here.
I’m not going to get into an arguing match with you about the rules. You know exactly what you’re doing and you’ve been told to stop. If you wish to question the rules, start a thread in About This Message Board. If you wish to continue the hijack in this topic, start a thread in the BBQ Pit.
I am new here and I entirely do not know what rule I am violating, but I’m a bit nervous now that you imply that I am violating one. I have been arguing with other people but I don’t feel I have stepped over any lines they haven’t beaten me to, so I was assuming I was in the clear.
I’m not exactly a wilting flower but I’m definitely trying to keep within the confines of the rules as I read them. If I’m not, please either reply here or send me a PM explaining because I really don’t want to.
You made it clear that you can’t understand how a car could possibly be blocking access to a curb-cut in an environment that would leave someone else in the road.
If you’re in a parking lot, of course, you are in a place where motor vehicles drive, and potentially waiting there if someone is blocking a curb cut.
So, clearly, your skepticism about the physical layout of the environment, a physical layout that would leave someone waiting in a road at a curb cut, indicates that you do not believe that it is even possible that our hero was ever in a parking lot. Because otherwise it would be easy to picture that circumstance.
Please don’t do that. Please.
Start a thread in ATMB, if you have any questions, as I said above.