Do you limit that to a “account of inappropriate sexual touching of a client” or any accusation of wrongdoing? That seems to give enormous potential for abuse, in which people can get other people fired based on a variety or motivations, or misinterpretations. If that can indeed open business owners up to liability, then I think some laws need to be changed, possibly.
I agree with this. Especially since it was cumulative (until the erection part, anyway).
[I once had an incident when I was having a medical procedure done. I was lying on my back and the anesthesiologist came in with various parts of his apparatus, and he put them down on me. Which wasn’t completely weird in its own right, since it was a pretty cluttered room and there wasn’t that much space elsewhere. But what was weird was that he put it down on my crotch area, such that when he picked them up again he kind of grabbed a bit extra. I’m not sure if this was deliberate. On the one hand, it was such minor contact that I wouldn’t think a guy would get off on such a thing, and maybe he was just a clueless doofus. OTOH, you would think that a guy who wasn’t motivated to do this deliberately would be careful to not do it. So I don’t know. Bottom line, my feeling was and is that if the guy meant nothing then fine, and if the guy did do it deliberately well then if a guy is so pathetic that he needs to resort to that then OK, whatever. My point here is just that sometimes things can be hard to interpret definitively, though at some point they may become clearer in a cumulative fashion.]