Could you please provide a cite for dopers not casting shadows? Sounds neat.
Will you define “real equality”?
It’s mostly that once I accept the facts as you lay them out, the odds of me continuing to get laid drastically decrease. It’s selfish, but a worthy trade off.
You command yourself only, and nobody else. I respond because I command it.
BTW, I understand completely…your trying to detach yourself from this craptacular thread that YOU created in which you flung the first witless insult, and yet you are trying so hard to believe that you somehow “showed us” your infinite wisdom and wit…
Classic troll.
We’ve been warned not to feed those of your ilk, but in this case, I think some of us here are more than willing to force feed you until you struggle to push yourself away from this table/thread of idiocy that YOU pushed forth from your own mentally twisted womb.
The way I see it…if it’s not done here and now, then it will have to be in some other silly and insulting thread that you will regurgitate back up in the near future, if the mods don’t tire of your act just yet. I liken it to sticking a finger down the throat to wretch the poison out now, rather than swallowing it and remain sick for a longer period of time. I think many others here feel the same way.
I think he means “Girls asking HIM out for once”, as though it’s inequality rather than, say, his personality that prevents that.
I rest my case.
Le Jacquelope, please give us a brief definition of “real gender equality”.
He already has. We’ll have real equality when ugly, spazzy guys can get just as many hot chicks as suave, good-looking guys. We currently have an unfair “attraction-based” system for distributing the hot chicks and it’s simply got to stop.
I can has hawt chics?
There are limits.
Why would you? You already know you have no shot at sex, so what have you got to lose?
What if I resort to foreigners?
Vampires!
Or was that mirrors?
[QUOTE=DianaG]
Why would you? You already know you have no shot at sex, so what have you got to lose?
[/QUOTE]
Oh, come now. :dubious: Le Jac is purported to be a billionaire, so at a minimum he could afford a Real Doll (with all the optional attachments)…
-XT
That should increase the likelyhood that he’ll gettin’ some.
I little bit.
There you go again, making up claims that I have no shot at sex.
You know you’re lying but you say this shit just to scare guys into shutting up about equality, which scares the hell out of you.
How many times are you going to find out that I’m not intimidated by your lies and laughably ineffective attempts at verbal terrorism before you give up?
Equality scares you. You’re lashing out.
Two genders, one set of laws and behavioral rules.
For the thousandth time.
No, you respond because you are reactionary.
And if I wanted to detach myself I would simply stop responding. Now you need to make up some reason why I don’t detach myself - one that, of course, salves your wounded ego. Like, say, ripping off my comment and replying to me, “because I command you”.
Don’t be ashamed. Ripoffs is all you’re capable of.
Things that women get away with:
Now can someone show me a published book by a man that says Are women necessary?
They can’t, obviously. Men have never stooped so low as to discriminate against another human being on the basis of their gender. Unlike WOMEN. Goddamn whores. :mad: