Right, women are sexist, men aren’t. That’s what I said. I don’t know why we’re arguing, we’re on the same side here.
The mere fact that you’re getting mocked for having a Real Doll when countless women are “empowered” by owning vibrators is a perfect example of society’s double standards. You shouldn’t have to lie and pretend to have a wife in order to gain social acceptance, that’s just not right.
Yeah, there’s a tendency here to reply to arguments against feminist dogma with “you can’t get any” or “your penis is small”.
Won’t somebody think of the croutons?
Actually, that’s a tendency to reply to Jacquelope wanking. When someone makes an intelligent argument against “feminist dogma”, let me know–most people who think they’re doing that are actually painting fake boobs on a straw man.
Oh jeez. Paranoia and subpar reading comprehension.
Stating the fact that “Are Men Necessary” is allowed by publishers and is sold on bookstore shelves, while “Are Women Necessary?” has never been found on any bookstore shelf, is not at all saying that men are not sexist.
It is saying that women have a right to question the right of males to exist, but not vice-versa.
Men can still be sexist and that statement be true.
It’s a fear-based, reactionary thing. They can’t help it. Men need to resort to these tactics to get brownie points. Women do it out of fear of losing their sense of victimhood entitlement.
It’s like paying some kind of reparations, except to women and not blacks.
Of course there is no book called Are Women Necessary! What a fool. Who do you think is going to do the housework, cook, have kids, raise the kids, take the little brats to soccer, iron your shirt, etc. Do you think GUYS are going to do that? Piffle. Get with the program Jacoff. We’ve had a good thing going for THOUSANDS of years and here you are trying to upset the applecart!
The people I feel sorry for are all the guys who went to the trouble to write books titled “Are Women Necessary?” only to find they were unable to publish them. All that work for nothing. 
Which is total bullshit – if anyone should get reparations, it should be you. I mean, having seen a book title questioning whether men are necessary? I can’t imagine anything much worse than that.
I can. Reading it.
Thank yew. Thank yew. I’ll be here all week.
“Are Jacquelopes Necessary?”
Now, that would fly off the shelves…
How fucking stupid do you have to be to think that there is some sort of evil force preventing books from being written?
So the book hasn’t been written, therefor isn’t allowed? Seriously, how fucking stupid can this guy be?
Who would actually read a book with that title? The reason it hasn’t been published is because no one cares enough to write it, and no one cares enough to read it.
A right? Is that in the constitution some where or are you full of shit yet again.
People write all kinds of shit, always have:
warning: pdf http://www.theabsolute.net/minefield/mansup.pdf
What’s really, truly, absolutely, the most fucking stupid part of this statement is that it completely ignores the fact that only a few decades ago women did NOT have the right to question.
Actually I’d rather bomb the apple cart from orbit. If you and your kind happen to be nearby.
I see no one here is even capable of answering why “Are Men Necessary?” is acceptable literature but “Are Women Necessary?” is not.
And you’re just trolling because you have no answer.
You’re assuming facts not in evidence. You’d have to show a person who wrote a book called “Are Women Necessary” who was rejected by publishers and his book refused by bookstores–that is, you have to show said book exists at all before you can make arguments based on it being suppressed.
That’s even ignoring the fact you in turn have no argument about how “Are Women Necessary” balances on the scales with Maxim, GQ, and seventy billion books by guys with stupid hats on how to abuse biological cues to seduce women who wouldn’t normally want to be seduced.
Are you fucking retarded? Since I suspect the answer might be yes, I’ll go ahead and spell out the answer to your fake dilemma: if someone thought they could sell a book titled “Are Women Necessary?” it would be on the front table at Borders as we speak. There are no forces conspiring against such a book beyond basic disinterest. A book titled “Are Men Necessary?” gets attention because it’s the sort of provocative nonsense that gets dumbfucks like you all worked up over the terrible reverse discrimination faced by the white man and oh won’t somebody think of the poor white man??
Just shut the fuck up already, you worthless sack of pubic hair.
I’ll take a stab at it.
The main reason that there are no books asking “Are Women Necessary?” is because, what with this puppy still being only a theoretical construct, the obvious answer - from a fundamental biological standpoint - is an unqualified “YES!”
No need to reference feminist politics. Just basic science.
Here’s the real answer: “Why Are Men Neccesary?”, “Why Are Women Neccesary?” Either one of those sounds like bullshit, touchy-feely, pop-psych, Dr. Phil, Oprah, emotion-wank pile of wasted verbs so who gives a shit in the first place.
That’s got to be the most brain dead response you’ve come up with yet. It got attention because women loved it, not because guys got offended. And I’m not white either, you shit eating waste of skin.
Your existence is the reason why bestiality is illegal.