We’ve seen a few by Karl Marx, but what about Marx’s polar opposite? The father of modern Capitalism, Adam Smith!
**CHAPTER I
Of the Division of Labour**
…The effect of the division of labour, in the general business of the Fellowship, will be more easily understood by considering in what manner it operates in more specific instances. This is to say, within the context of the Fellowship, there exist several different classes, each of which performs a task to satisfy but a small number of people; but, taken together, it can be seen with certainty that their combined efforts produce a product which would have been unachievable, or impracticable, were only one person to have contributed to its execution.
To take, therefore, an example from a seemingly trifling business; but a business in which the division of labour has been very often taken notice of, the trade of the ring-bearer. A workman not educated to this business, nor acquainted with the customs, or traditions, employed in it, could scarce acquire a ring of power, let alone bear it to its destruction. However, in the way in which this business is now carried on, each member of the Fellowship exerts his own peculiar efforts toward the ring-bearing; so that one procures the ring, another transfers it to the bearer, another bears it, another defends the bearer, and so on; so that the business of bearing a ring is actually divided into about nine distinct operations. Though only one workman bears the ring itself, it would not practicable for him to bear it, nor to have begun to bear it, without the support, or assistance, of the other workmen of the Fellowship…
Hope that didn’t numb everyone’s brain too much…
