Lefty
Plenty of room for subtlety in the case of individuals, but the substance is addictive, and continual use is addiction. Not life ending in many cases, not even socially debilitating in many cases. But addiction is a fact. Chemical changes in the human metabolism do take place. Denying that is simply ignoring the truth. You decide for yourself if you care to eliminate the substance, based on your life, and your perceptions. Alcohol will change both of them, and your judgement, as well. The fact that it happens the very first time you consume alcohol doesn’t change because you feel it is emotionally difficult to respond to.
I don’t think everyone should join AA. I never did. I had no trouble at all eliminating the social consequences of alcohol from my life, and I still have two bottles of liquor in my kitchen. It was not a serious problem for me. (Unlike a completely separate addiction which was, for me very difficult to control.) But, the facts are still the same. If you consume alcohol for social, or emotional reasons, or a desire to feel the effects of the drug, that behavior is addictive behavior. The loudness of the quack does not determine whether it is a duck.
I have no axe to grind on the subject of social drinking. I think it is a very strong indicator of a society’s inherent dependence on substance abuse to maintain docility in the masses, but hey, societies tend to do whatever works in that regard. I simply refuse to ignore the fact that addiction is addiction, however beneficial the addict perceives it to be. Addiction is not an indicator of human worth, either. It’s a condition of metabolic adaptation, and has profound emotional effects. That condition exists, however slightly, in every case where a human ingests alcohol in any significant amount. Most of the time, it takes many events to make the metabolic adaptation that ruins lives. But the change starts with one drink, and your judgement of your addictive state is an unreliable measure. Unfortunately it is the only measure that will effect the necessary condition of change, the decision to make a change.
In a later post someone said they drink alcoholic beverages even though they don’t like them. Point made, right there. You only drink lemonade if you like lemonade. Lemonade doesn’t get you drunk. So, you drink alcohol to get drunk. Only a little bit drunk, because you are a decent and worthy person, and would never sink to the level of street bums sucking from a paper covered bottle of hooch. But that is the societal evaluation coming from those who condemn one addict, and excuse another. I don’t think either of them is a bad person, just a person addicted to a drug. How badly addicted is a place to examine subtlety, but drinking something you don’t like because you want to get high is addiction. Drinking because you want to have fun is addiction. Drinking because you want to not hurt, or feel is addiction. Drinking because you like the taste is not addiction, although I would like to point out that it wouldn’t prevent addiction. (Although you have to drink a lot of Lemonade to get really messed up on the stuff.)
Tris