Unless you’re talking about another filibuster, the one that made Wendy Davis famous was to prevent legislation forcing the closing of abortion clinics. Texas already had laws on the books banning late term abortions.
The problem is that one of the secret Kenyan abortion babies survived and was quickly hustled into a secret ISIS time machine (you didn’t know ISIS had a time machine? Well, you do now) so they could break into Queen Kapiolana hospital and switch the now-Muslamified infant with the real Barack Obama, who instead grew up to be Cuba Gooding Jr.
Somehow I doubt the OP was considering voting for her if not for that.
Oh, this is Texas. Everything is bigger in Texas. Even abortions, I guess.
When Shodan waddles in with a gavel and his barrister’s mullet and lays down the law, you know you’ve lost.
I doubt it was a mistake. We know how Shodan lies.
Is “Men’s Right’s” and “feminism” this board’s new thing now? I’m not defending “men’s rights”, oh good lord, far from it. It’s just that it seems like every other year we get some issue that produces way too much traffic. Because that’s what this is. Whether it’s blatant misogyny, “scientific” racism, JDT on circumcision, Der Trihs on atheism, somebody I forget on declawing cats, or goddman Cesario on fucking pedophila, we go through these cycles.
Besides, I thought “rape month” ended a while back. Can somebody post a calender so I can plan for the next cycle? This one snuck up on my me.
Christ! I just had a vision of Obnoxio The Clown doing a bad Judge Judy imitation.
Maybe they won’t step up because they think that only shitheads want to know and their shithead circulation is low.
You may have to ask this one yourself.
I really don’t want to know about anyone’s abortions.
Seriously, can we please bring some boundaries back to the world?
I think it’s about feminism and more about the fact that we’ve got a couple of vile MRA-type assholes hanging around here these days. Maybe they’re acting up because ‘women’s issues’ are in the news more often these days. You don’t have to be a hardcore feminist to be grossed out by kstarnes or blindboyard or “gold digger” dalej42 & co.
I was talking about this one -
Regards,
Shodan
I do, if it’s a politician trying to restrict the rights of women having abortions (obviously not Wendy Davis). Then her hypocrisy should be exposed. Or least she needs to show us how good she is at asking for forgiveness.
Unfortunately if people are going to try to ban it and talk about how evil and shameful it is, people are also going to need to talk about it in public. Doing anything else concedes the premise of the argument.
I’m pretty sure the answer to that is going to be “no.”
Maybe. But even if we do, there will always be a tribe of not-so-higher primates trying to force their buttcheeks between the fence pickets.
I will go on record here to say that I have never had an abortion.
Late term abortions weren’t being performed in Texas before the bill anyway, you dumb piece of shit. That part of the bill only put an exclamation mark on it. Those other little details about mobile surgical centers and admitting privileges? Yeah, those were important and the actual subject of the bill and filibuster.
Maybe read more than the headlines or a blurb before demonstrating your idiocy once again?
I’ll correct myself. Yes, a few late term abortions were performed before the bill in Texas. But a small, small percentage of them, and mostly due to severe birth defects.
Doesn’t change the point. The OP is an idiot and the half-assed defense was ill-conceived and probably by reflex.
Do you have a cite that they were legal before the bill was passed? Because all the articles I have been able to Google say that this bill did, in fact, constitute a ban on abortions after the 20th week, along with the other restrictions.
You silly snotbag.
Regards,
Shodan
Go back to Stormfront, you tiny dicked bird brain.