With almost every post, Adaher confirms the veracity of the OP.
…then you wouldn’t make things up about people, and make blind assumptions about their beliefs and motivations?
I wouldn’t have to read between the lines. Some people here need to stop acting like political operatives.
Says the mindless partisan that clucks whatever it takes in the moment to make a point. Without regard to that clucking comporting with reality.
Adaher, you’re a fucking stooge.
Different kind of complaint. When Republicans say something stupid or just outright lie I agree with those who point it out or defend it if there’s merit to defending it. Was there a single liberal Doper who admitted that people would lose their health insurance? Was there more then three who thought the Democrats were campaigning stupidly in 2014? There were a lot more than three the day after, not so many the day before.
Just for the record, neither of my friends is gay.
You’re close in this case.
But you knew that.
As far as you know.
No, we know a fair amount about your thought processes, leading me to conclude that you’re either a paid shill for the Republican party or that you are severely shortchanged on critical thinking skills.
You still don’t seem to get just what was the most astonishingly dumb claim you made. It is this:
How can you conceivably believe this? Republicans have been talking about little else since the decision. If it weren’t for a few other decisions last week which they found equally unpalatable, it would have been ALL they were talking about.
Since your thought processes lead to conclusions like this … maybe there’s some kind of assisted living home you can find.
And in South Florida, that isn’t hard, either.
Paid shills don’t concede that the Republican brand is shit. Paid shills do put on a brave front in the weeks before an election when the party is clearly driving themselves into a ditch. We must have a lot of those on the liberal side here judging by the commentary on the last election just before it happened.
I’m seeing the same idiocy now. Clinton’s weaknesses are so obvious, yet denied up and down, as if anything you say here can influence the election.
So, mental defect then.
Again with the “we” versus “you”. This mob mentality is weak, cheap and unnecessary. If you disagree with someone, why not just keep the disagreement between them and you? Invoking the “we” really is a sign of a lack of confidence in one’s own position and/or ability to make and argument. It’s the tactic of punks, weaklings, bullies and those who need a gang around them to stick their chests out. It’s a cheap tactic.
Is anyone here being paid? If so, please give me the phone number – I really want to get in on that.
You were totally unable to see Romney’s weaknesses, so I’m rather unswayed that you have any special insight into Clinton’s (or anyone else’s). You’ve yet to demonstrate that you’re anything but terrible at predicting presidential elections.
Warm round of applause for magellan01, for his tireless efforts in the fight against blind partisanship. Let’s hope the punks, weaklings and bullies learned something about the merits of honest debate.
That’s why I love this place. I’m a punk, weakling AND a bully, so I get triple minutes on my phone plan.
But are you a paid shill?
I work for the patron saint of punks, weaklings and bullies – Chris Christie.
How much *do *they pay you?