But yeah, it really doesn’t look like her compared to the photo where she is standing next to Rockwell. I did hear that there was more air brushing involved than usual, but I didn’t think it would change her that much.
Sorry, lapsing into my judgmental, prune-faced pissant mode, but what a skank.
Didn’t see the show (not my tipple), but you’d have to have lived on Neptune not to catch the fallout. I was willing to give Darva the benefit of the doubt, she did a stupid thing, etc. etc. but wasn’t totally warped.
Oh, c’mon. She can’t get a nursing job?! Give me a freakin’ break. Qualified nurses are pure gold. If she hadn’t kept the whole fiasco alive, wouldn’t be a reporter or photographer interested.
–>the following is a careful disclaimer; comments not intended to include nudists and happily unihibited people<–
If someone is body-proud and unashamed, that’s fine, honestly fine and admirable. But coyly playing “victim of the media”, broke and can’t get a nursing job, etc.–oh, puhleeze.
Strictly as a sidenote, is posting that kind of proprietary stuff okay for SD? I have no idea, just wondering.
Why, oh why, can’t she just be a good girl and go AWAY? Seeing her on TV once was bad enough. Seeing her on “Politically Incorrect” was not fun. Listening to Jim Rome talk about her for a ****** hour was a waste of breath.
I’m not even going to TOUCH the idea of her being nude. You could not pay me.
Ummm, apperently it was cold, REAL cold. That actually looks really painfully cold (you know what I mean ladies).
I don’t think she is a skank, but I do think she is pretty pathetic and I feel sorry for her. She could do well for herself if she tried, but well, she is pretty pathetic.
Her nipples are horrifying! I have never in my life seen nipples like that…NEVER! Granted I have not seen many, but still…yuck yuck yuck yuck yuck!
Moving along…people sure do stupid shit for money. She is skinny and not that pretty, but for godsakes, get an office job or something. There is no need for her to degrade herself like that!
Well, yes I’m pretty sure it is her. It does seem clear that she’s had some secret plastic surgery which shockingly has been kept quiet. I’ve seen alot of the press conferences recently over this, and it seems certain to me that its the same person head to toe. BTW, airbrushing is great for blemishes, it doesn’t change ones shape and still present realistically in print. A comparison to the “wedding” photo does look suspiscious, this is evidence of some plastic surgery to me, not a conspiracy by Playboy. Playboy has too much to lose by lying anyways.
On to the the obligatory rants and raves. 1) She got on TV for her 15 minutes of fame. 2) She most likely didn’t expect or want to get married. 3) She is milking the fame for all its worth. 4) She’s playing the victim of the media role to try and deflect the golddigger label. 5) Its not fair to call her a golddigger for marrying the “millionaire”. 6) It is fair to call her a liar and fame hound. 7) If you morally disgusted, yet completely fixated people would let it go she’d disaapear, the fact everyone enjoys vilifying her so much gives Rome a reason to badger her in primetime.
FTR, she’s pretty fucking hot by typical nurse standards. Yeah, in the wedding on TV she looks pretty bad compared to typical TV people, but IRL most everyone would at least argee shes not ugly. She might not be your type, but she’s not ugly or disgusting. In Playboy (post surgery?) she is flat out hot, the unaugmented body a pleasent change. Now, if you are biased against stereotypical California blonde types fine, but ranting on how “gross” she looks make you sound pretty childish, or maybe jealous. Anyways, if you want her to go away, and you want to look down your nose at her, try and get over it so the media has nothing to report.
Nacho, maybe its personal taste, but I like her nipples. One of those things I like to notice on a woman, probably since, unlike men, some women show no visual signs of arousal. Nips are the exception, and Darva’s rival the male’s response ;).
I never thought she was ugly. I agree, to go on about how “gross” she is is unkind. I’d die happy to have a figure like that. (OK, I’d probably gain a few pounds, but what the hell.) Compared to your average shmoe out there, she’s pretty. Fair is fair, she’s attractive - maybe not everyone’s type, but basically attractive. Even with her apparently (to some of you) unattractive nose, she’s still not ugly. Once again, compare her to your average shmoe. Or just look in the mirror. I don’t like insults bandied around about anyone’s looks - I’m funny like that.
As far as doing Playboy, yeah, tacky. And it’s not like I look at Playboy, but I’ve gotten the impression that some of the girls’ poses in there can be a little more “suggestive” or “lurid”. Darva’s poses are more “tasteful” or even “arty”. But, still, in my opinion, I think her posing in Playboy was tacky.
I have no opinion about her nipples. Nipples is nipples, you get what you get. (I guess I have a more liberal attitude about naked people, male or female. I have taken tons of Life Drawing classes, and have drawn every imaginable variation of the naked human body, from live nude models.) And come to think of it, Darva’s poses were more “Life Drawing” type poses. So - shrug.
Not exactly my type overall, but I would hardly call her ugly or a skank. As a person, she disgusts me. As a pure physical form, I did not have to force myself to look closely.
Of course, I happen to like large, erect nipples. They are fun to play with.
OK bod (a bit on teh malnourished side, but not bad) but dear lord did you SEE THE MAKE-UP? These pictures make Tammy Fae look “natural” My god, did they apply it with a paint roller or what? I mean, dear god, PETA should protest on account of the distinct possibility that passing wildlife (flies, mosquitoes, small birds) could get stuck to her face. Jeez, honey, wash some of that crap off…
Jayron32 (whose own taste runs more towards well-fed, un-made-up women)
No comment on the nipples; since I’m a female, the point is moot. But the two supine shots look creepy; her body is too long and thin, like kelp that washed up on shore.
Veb, I think you meant to say “prurient”. I suppose it is, but this is the Web, not AOL, and we’re under no obligation to keep this a “family show”, as vandal claims. Ultimately, it’s up to the mods and the Reader.
Oh C’mon you hypocrites… So the pictures are ‘tacky’. She was paid something like half a million dollars for those pictures. C’mon, look uncle Dan straight in the monitor and tell me that if someone knocked on your door and said, “spend a day with us, letting us take tasteful pictures of you nude, and we’ll give you more money than you can possibly hope to earn busting your ass in a clerical job for the next twenty years,” you’d just say “I’m not tacky” and slam the door?
This isn’t exactly Hustler she’s posing for. Posing for Playboy is no big deal. Many famous people have done it. Gloria Steinem was a Playboy Bunny.
If you ask me, she’s been very smart through this whole thing. I saw her on Politically Incorrect, and she seemed pretty sharp. She also admitted that she was stupid for having done it in the first place. Very shrewd. The stupid mistake got her in the public eye. Once there, she’s managed to stay in it, by admitting right from the bat that she was wrong for doing it. Now the Playboy spread not only make her a lifetime’s worth of income, but it keeps her in the public eye for another month, long enough for her publicist or agent (I’ll bet she has one) to find her some other gigs.
The whole premise of the show was, “Marry this Dork, and get half of his million.” Well, she found a way to get the half million AND put the boots to the dork without so much as having to undress in front of him.