Because it seems so to me. And I’m struck by the difference in numbers between Darwin Fish and out-and-out atheist bumper stickers. (In fact, I can only recall ever having seen one of the latter – in Cambridge, Mass., naturally.) But maybe my assumption is wrong; maybe there are loads of believing Unitarians out there with Darwin Fish on their cars.
It doesn’t have to be an atheist symbol, since there are plenty of Christians who accept evolution, but I think the play on the Jesus fish has made it into one. Of course a Jewish biologist could get one, but they might like the “Gefilte” fish pin better.
The Darwin fish has always kind of bugged me, because it seems like such a non-sequitor. I mean, it started with the basic fish symbol, which has been used in Christianity since the earliest days. It’s supposed to symbolize Jesus specifically or Chrisitianity in general. It’s not an anti-evolution statement; the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and mainline Protestant churches all accept evolution.
So why the attempt to mock this symbol by connecting it to Darwinism? It’s a pretty nonsensical retort.
That’s why I think that probably most Darwin fish are displayed by athiests who probably think that religous=creationist.
True story–I had a Darwin fish on my jeep years ago. In Mississippi–some idiot walks up to me with a big smile in the parking lot of the Winn-Dixie, and says “so where you go to church?” There was no irony, this person was truly clueless!
It used to be that the fish symbol was filled with Greek letters spelling out ichthyus, meaning fish, but also a Greek acrostic. The letters could also stand for Jesus Christ, God’s son savior. OK, not a great acrostic, but still interesting.
And the counter-counter symbol, which shows a fish with the word “TRUTH” etched on its side eating a smaller fish which says “DARWIN”, are displayed by religious people who undoubtedly think that Evolution is incompatible with Christianity.
I can see where you’re coming from, and I’m not disputing anything you’re saying, but IMHO it’s quite obvious that the vast majority of the visible anti-evolution rhetoric in the “Western” world is coming from evangelical Christian sects, so I think the Darwin fish does make some kind of sense.
I’d be afraid to put a Darwin fish on my car. Some religious nut will go berserk. So much for religion and morality. Whatever the fish originally says, it now (usually) says Jesus.
But aside from being a sendup of Christianity, it is also a serious statement. What is shows is a fish developing limbs and presumably evolving to live on land. Thus it is a picture of evolution.
Wait, what? Your saying that religious people are hypocrites because why they preach religion and morality, in your head they respond to your hypothetical Darwin Fish by vandalism? I’ve heard of people being accused of thought crimes, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone accused of a crime that happened in someone elses thoughts.
Anyhoo, as to the OP, I usually see it as an anti-creationist symbol rather then pro-atheism, though obviously there’s a lot of overlap there.