I can’t understand why they removed the up button in Vista. The breadcrumb thing works ok, but if the folder name is too big or the window is too small, all I see is the current folder and to go back I have to click the little down arrows and find the folder I need. Too time consuming and counter-intuitive.
Anyway, is there any way to get an up button? Is microsoft ever going to address this problem with a patch or something?
But that’s not a ‘folder up’ button. To demonstrate this, in c:, click on the Windows directory, then click on the Program Files directory; now click on the ‘back button’ and you’ll get the Windows directory, not c:.
To go up a level, I just click on the directory name in the address bar or in the folder tree on the left.
It takes you back one level in the directory path (i.e. to the folder or volume containing the folder you’re now viewing) - that’s not necessarily ‘back’ in terms of the last place you visited.
Looks like you can have one though - I did a google search on Windows Vista Up Button and found a number of third-party add-ons to provide the function.
Start at C:
In the address bar, type c:\windows\fonts
Now, if you press the UP button, it will take you UP a directory, to c:\windows.
However, if you use the BACK button, it will take you BACK to C:\
I don’t see the need for the Up button – you can click anywhere in the displayed path at the top of the window and go to any folder in that path. If you’re in c:\foo\bar\dog\cat, and you want to go up one level, click on “dog” in the path. If the path is too long, you get a popup list. There’s also a popup next to the c:, which can take you to Documents, Computer, and other places.
It is confusing at first, and I would agree MS made a bad decision to do away with the more familiar UI widget.
Ahhh, I got it. I rarely use the directory tree. So the way it was phrased didn’t make sense to me as it’s not possible (the way I do it) to go from c:\windows to c:\program files without going back and then to the other one.