Is this picture sexy to you and if so....

I was going to say that, for me, it would depend on her demeanor, until I read this:

Yeah, that pretty much makes it “no” for me.

The look is kinda sultry, and the wig and makeup suggest she’s into some interesting stuff. But there’s nothing that really pushes it to sexy for me.

I don’t get the “kid” comparison, though. She does not look like a kid. She looks like someone who does theater. Her makeup would actually have to be bad, not overdone, to look like a kid.

Nope

No, the hair is weird and the makeup makes it look like she has two black eyes. My immediate reaction was of someone coming out of an abusive relationship.

Regards,
Shodan

Not at all. Her drivers license probably has a better picture. She is likely attractive, but doing her best to hide it here.

No.

What’s really awkward is having someone show me a picture and ask if it’s sexy… do you do this in real life? Walk up to strangers and show them “sexy” photos of women?

My immediate reaction when I saw the thread title was “Oh, another teenager stuck at home with his hormones.” OR, older guy stuck at home with his hormones…
I’d stick to showing random women’s photos to close friends who will understand.

Not just not sexy, but aggressively repelling.

I’d do that if your premise was anything close to rooted in reality.

The pic isn’t the best from my perspective either, but I was going to say the same thing, there is a hint of something/submissiveness/inviting/vulnerability/openness. I think tilt+eyes and eyebrows might be part of that impression.

No. It’s like satire of a sexy picture. The hair is overdone, the eyes are overly made up, the eyes fall in shadow of the hair, the head is tilted so far that the eyes are straining to look up. And she looks like she’s about to become unhinged. This picture says to me, “C’mon over here, honey. I’m going to bite your dick off.”

I think that’s what they were going for.

It looks like stage makeup, which always looks terrible up close, because that’s not how it’s meant to be viewed. If I were watching her perform from a hundred feet away, then that exaggerated makeup and wig might well enhance whatever sort of performance she was trying to put on (which might or might not be sexy).

The picture of her by the river is a much more attractive shot of her, but the photo itself still looks odd somehow, as if it were a collage instead of a real scene, like someone took separate pictures of the face, scarf, and background, and composited them together.

It smacks of effort.

No, she looks like an alien.

Damn that’s racist!!!

Maybe if it was 1968.

Just looks ridiculous now, although it’s obvious there’s an attractive person underneath all that.

Most likely: she was trying for the Dusty Springfield look.

There isn’t a single question on IMHO that I would walk up and ask a stranger.

Practically the opposite for me. Good makeup takes effort and doesn’t look all that much like makeup. This is applied quite badly.

I think Cindy Wilson is a quite fine looking person. But with this 60s high school skag look, nope.

Heh.

“Excuse me. Do you find Chimpanzees creepy??”

What does she charge to haunt houses?