Did he mention that he was “effing” her in another part of the email that you didn’t post? Because I didn’t get that from the “in the sack”, comment.
At age 43, I am usually just in the sack to sleep, weather Mr. Cat is there or not.
I might tell someone that I didn’t send out an email because Mr. Cat and I were already in bed for the night. Maybe he just uses “the sack” to mean that?
Hm, possible. But I think the fact that he couldn’t do something because he was “in the sack with J***” means that he was doing something active. True, it could mean that she was asleep and he didn’t want to wake her by getting out of bed, but “in the sack” is used as an euphemism for sex often enough that in conjunction with the inability to send a three line email, I’d find it more likely that he did indeed mean “sexin”.
No news there – stay tuned for Sunday’s “I just had brunch with my brother whom I haven’t seen in 4 years” OP. (Why, yes, I am looking forward to this with a mix of dread and suspicious curiosity, thank you for asking.)
Anyway – thanks for your feedback, all. “Seriously bizarre” seems to be the consensus, which is good to know. I really didn’t know whether my visceral shudder was an overreaction or not.
As to what his trip is … sigh. The full version is pretty long – but apparently his behavior is getting fairly odd. I think his sister is coming to Philly for the Flower Show in March, so we’ll get a full version from her then. For now, I really don’t know whether he’s eccentric or on his way to seriously nuts.
He sends out a weekly email, kind of a LJ-ly, free associational thing that’s neither as well-written nor as profound as he seems to think it is. I usually skim it quickly looking for actual news, and ignore whatever musings on the socio-political scene he may include (he’s way at the other end of the political spectrum from me). I think I should have saved the email he sent the day after the election, because I can’t reconstruct now how odd it was – but basically it was “Congrats to you liberals, I’m really worried what this is going to do to the country but I honor the electoral process. Guess I know now what y’all were feeling in '00.” :rolleyes:
Anyway, so he’s weird and clueless and likes to get a rise out of people, and I guess that’s all there is to it.
And I’m just going to ignore it, funny though Sage Rat’s suggestion is.
PS: astro – thank you for the lovely card. It’s times like this I the nasty things I said during our divorce.
Include my vote on the tally of being tacky to the point of creepiness given his age. Mostly because of his age - what I could accept or even expect from a twenty-something becomes something else when we’re talking someone who would normally be assumed to have reached maturity.
Can I say that I happen to think you’re wonderfully weird, anyways?
Sounds a lot more level-headed and mature than what I heard from all the conservatives I know, which was basically “thanks for electing the demon spawn of Karl Marx and Satan, assholes. I hope you enjoy watching the country burn followed by standing in toilet-paper lines within 2 years.”
Yeah – but that he felt compelled to update all of us immediately on his okayness with the election was just weird. Did you get a slew of mass emails on Nov. 5th announcing your friends’ reactions to the election? Me either.
I guess it depends on the nature of your relationship with your cousin. My cousin Nicky would have no problem saying such a thing to me, nor would I have any problem hearing it. We’d both just laugh it off.
For some continuation, forward this to J*** on her email. 'Cause I bet she never saw this email before he sent it out to you and possibly other family members. It may lead to her having a ‘discussion’ with him.