Just use the Report Post button if you feel you must and then shut the fuck up about it because the rest of us are sick of your inane whining.
The creation of Israel was thirty years after WWI ended. Put THAT in your pipe-and stick it up your ass.
Bolding mine. Are you sure that’s what it “resultet” in? Maybe you’d be more comfortable posting in your native language. Don’t worry about a barrier, we can all read Moronic.
I.d take Fuckwits given location as Central Europe with a massive pinch of salt if I were you,there have been “several” posters putting extreme anti Western/British/European/U.S. views forward in the past giving that location,maybe it gives in his opinion some sort of spurious validity/impartiality to his hate mail rather then being honest about who he really is and where hes really from.
If he is actually in Europe at all I’ll bet he originated somewhere else but hasn’t got the guts to tell us.
I will, but first I must visit the haberdashery for a new set of starched collars.
Can’t say as I’ve noticed. :dubious:
Goalpost-moving. My contention is that Israel’s government is better than its neighbors by the criteria mentioned, not that it was free of problems. By any of the four criteria list, can you point out another country in the area whose record is as good or better than Israel’s?
And I’m not crying anything. The Palestinians are not citizens of Israel. Personally, I think they should just declare statehood over all the territory they currently have and cut their losses, but as long as they view their children as expendable, I guess they have no incentive.
Why sir, you have changed the text inside the quote tabs. In your haste to point out where Wildfire claimed there was no holocaust, no doubt.
No, I did not. So, now you’re a liar, too.
Let’s leave that ‘citizens’ word behind. Fact is Palestinians are governed by Israelis, who protests to the West notwithstanding, plan only to expand control and occupation of the lands. There is no intelligible measure of the Israeli governments that does not consider their treatment there.
There’s still time on the edit window for you to revise.
To be fair, perhaps you have a reading peculiarity and must, of necessity omit the relevant heart of posts that might disturb you. You really should tell people in that case.
No need. I stand by my statement.
Notice any difference here?
You will see on re-reading that Wildfire referred to the immigration as occurring post WWI.
Only an omission (as permitted by the rules) of material not relevant to post. The actual text within my quote tags is otherwise unaltered. Again, you are invited to report the post if you nevertheless feel it’s a violation, however, I’ve been around long enough to be fairly certain that nothing will come of such an action.
STFU and tongue my balloon knot, the lot of ya!
Christ, I can’t even read the thread next door for all this racket!
But, Daaaaaaaad!
Fine, if you’ll acknowledge it was you who brought it up in the first place.
Fine, consider it. And please consider the other criteria mentioned.
If you mean this as a serious complaint, you are a complete idiot. Q.E.D. did not change anything “within the quote tags.” There is no requirement to quote an entire post when replying to it.
Report that, jackass.
How do you feel about the Fourth of July?