So a legal question: if he testified now before a hearing, could anything he said be considered unreliable due to his brain cancer? (Not that I think it would have been necessarily any more reliable before.)
Anyone know about the poor guy he hit? AFAIK, there has been no public information on the guy.
The Post says he’s an 86 year old who suffered a dislocated shoulder and is under observation.
It also says that Novak is retiring immediately.
If he’s faking it, he’s going to get caught. And when he does, he’s going to be ruined. He’ll face consequences far worse than the fine and civil settlement he would have had to pay for the hit and run. (In fact, he might still have to pay.) Novak is smart enough to know this. Your theory makes no sense.
He’s part of a big club that lives by the mantra “I can get away with it!”. Why should he give a fuck? He’ll get away with it.
-Joe
But he won’t get away with it. He can’t get away with it. He knows that. And there’s no reason for him to try to get away with it. Does it really make sense that he’d go through all the trouble of faking cancer, with the years of lying and acting and paying people off that would entail, an effort that would almost certainly be exposed, just to get out of a fine and a civil suit that would be forgotten in a few months?
Believe it or not, it’s possible to find a negative interpretation of your suggestion that Novak is so cheap and dishonest and stupid that he would pretend to have a lethal brain tumor just to avoid a traffic judgment he could probably afford easily, many times over. I guess you’re trying to be positive, but like I was saying, it doesn’t quite read that way.
To you.
I fully understood what the poster was trying to say.
Thank you.
I had stopped following that thread when it became a total car wreck.
He was a jerk of the highest order but I wouldn’t wish this on Rash Limpballs. He’s retired and fighting for his life, I wish him the best.