Considering that you refuse to engage with those who have actually presented facts to refute your claims, then yeah, it sounds like it might as well be closed.
Post 33 clinched it. I’m sure the OP had that one locked and loaded, ready to go as soon as he got enough negative responses, regardless of their merit.
So we can point and laugh at you. Sad little muppet.
I’m afraid to ask because I’m sure the answer is horribly stupid, but what’s the deal with the constant "Billary"ing? Yes, I get that Hillary is married to Bill…so?
The Right has always *hated *the fact that Bill and Hillary work together, instead of him making all the decisions and her standing silently in back of him like a mannequin like a “good” First Lady. For them, implying that the Clintons are partners instead of master and servant is an insult.
Mkay…so yeah, a horribly stupid non-issue. Got it. Thanks.
Really, it is because Bill Clinton was such a horrible, vile, perverted detestable scumbag, and you should know that all the country hated him and his failed administration that brought so much ruin upon us all, and a Hillary Clinton presidency would just be more of that misery. Hence, “Billary”, “Shillary”, “Hitlary”, and any other ever so clever wordplay is entirely appropriate.
Ah yes. I had forgotten about the world ending in the 90’s. Good thing UberArchtype is around to remind us all that it did with such a brilliant use of portmanteau.
Is it too much to ask that the next dumb troll that starts dumb threads is a smart dumb troll?
Seconded. To the point that when she *does *put a round or two into her own foot many really can’t tell any more.
In that sense, maybe it HELPS that she’s not a great public speaker - less inclination to go for the zingery catchphrase that later bites her in the ass.
Frankly, I’d be cheering if her inaugural speech included the phrase “it’s about time you lazy congressional fucks started doing your damn jobs! Stop thinking about trying to hurt me and start thinking about how to help your constituents!”
Ideally, of course, that call is not necessary because of a general tea party purging in the House and Senate elections.
I think it’s a bit deeper. HRC is actually pretty boring and innocuous, and most of the evil deeds in her backstory (Benghazi, emails) are pissweak and not well understood at the kindergarten reading level at which the rightwing nutjob universe is written. Her storyline as an evil character doesn’t have a lot of visceral weight.
Contrastingly, the legend of how Bill was impeached for being a raping sex monster is known to every rightwing moron. His “heel” storyline is well established. He’s a top shelf bogeyman.
So in the current plotline, the more Bill and Hill can be tied together as an inseparable duo - virtually the same person - the better.
It’s almost like there’s been some sort of coordinated conservative campaign against the… …well, no, not all conservatives, that’s a really broad brush, let me say right-wing. A coordinated right-wing campaign against the Cli… …well, really, it’s been too secretive to be called a campaign - how about conspiracy? A well-coordinated right-wing conspiracy against Bill and Hilla… … …good point, yes, so, it actually hasn’t been that well-coordinated. It’s just been insidious. Widespread. bigly. Vast.
I found a clip that sums it up:
Just watch the first 20 seconds. That should be enough.
Ah, the Putin standard. Interesting.
This just makes no sense at all. Next time, just type “argle bargle Hillary bad”
Protip: Try not to bring up Trump’s BFF Putin in a political debate. It just makes people laugh and point at you.
Easy there, tiger. The point is that if unflappable composure is what one holds in esteem, kinda hard to beat Putin. Sorry if reality upsets you.
Not particularly upset.
Pointing.
Laughing.
I thought the Putin standard was to be seen as bald and not as bold…
Oooooooo…pointing. :eek: