JDT: FUCK YOU.

hmmmm…
what does a troll like to eat?

It’s been said before, but I refuse to acknowledge jdt anymore.

Sorry, absoul, didn’t mean to accuse you of a thing. Meant the DNFTT for the previous poster.

Moron…leave iampunha alone you freak of nature.

You’re the puss, your the puss because you can’t get any…face it. No real woman would want a man that talks like you do. No real woman would want a man that spouts off bullshit and dribbles elephant urine from his mouth.

So go away you putrid gorilla vomit and find another board to spew your crap.

JDT, I have to hand it to you. I thought I had come across some pure morons in my life but you top them all. I indeed pity your parents, the perpetual, overwhelming sense of regret they must feel for birthing you must be all consuming.

P.S. Falcon hardly ever swears, she is a fine lady and to get her to invoke the “F” word requires a substantial motivating factor. Other posters may have hurled the word at you, but, when Falcon does it, it is a thousand fold.

You are an ignorant, arrogant, pompous , misbegotten, clueless toad.

Let me tell you something, rape is forced sexual activity period. It doesn’t make a damn which orifice is penetrated.
And a penis is not the only object a person can be raped with either. There have been rapes involving everything from gun barrels to broom stick and more.

I hope your Mother learned to swallow after you were born. I would hate to think that there are more men with your attitude running around in the world. You should let her read the bullshit you are posting here. Maybe then she will teach you what a real man is.

And just FYI, American women are not ill raised, we have just learned to call an asshole an asshole.

Oh, and I prefer circumcised men.

One last thing, UNfuck you very much . Do not kiss my ass. (TennHippie would be proud of me)

Enjoy your trip.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Jack Dean Tyler *

[quote]
**I didn’t try to put down the woman’s experience. I acknowledged that it was probably terrible, whatever it was. I only made the point that rape is one thing and sodomy is something else. Call it what it is. Because there are so many pussified (through no fault of their own) men such as yourself around, woman can say or do whatever they want and they will not be called on it. In fact, and I take no position on this myself, Robert Sheaffer has done research showing that one should not necessarily trust a woman who claims to have been raped. Woman apparently lie a lot about this crime and it doesn’t help when a woman can call anything at all “rape.” Can a man so worthless as yourself understand even that?
**

I’ve also seen research that indicates you can’t trust men with three names, small cocks, zero girlfriends, and huge phallic obsessions with foreskins.

This hardly seems like a phrase that would be used by a person who expects his theories to be taken seriously, JDT. Then again, I had some initial doubts over the word “BuckyBalls”, so I will allow my linguistic prudishness to slide this time.

May I take it that this is your official stance on “pussification”? I have some questions for you regarding all of this. As you have claimed in the past to be a skeptic, I am certain that you would not believe all of these things without proper evidence. And, though you have avoided my inquiries in the past, I am sure as a skeptic you will not pass up the oppurtunity to shed further light on flawed assumptions and faulty logic.

Is the above statement opinion, theory, or fact? The elements of the statement appear to be opinion, but they are presented in the context of this discussion as fact. Part of the problem may be that you are using such inexact language. Let me go through the statement piece by piece.

This statement seems to simply be one of opinion. As such, it relies upon a great deal of subjectivity to make any sense. After all, is there some “baseline masculinity” or “baseline femininity” which all human beings naturally posess? The statement seems to be a contrasting of the speaker’s notions of masculinity/femininity and the prevailing cultural norms. As such, it is dependant upon the speaker’s own psychological background, is completely subjective, and is of no descriptive value in a scientific sense.

If you disagree with my assertion above, I think you will have to provide details as to the objectivity of your statement. Does there exist any sort of nonsubjective screening method to determine a subject’s level of pussification? A written test, or psychological inventory, taken without previous knowledge of the subject’s penile state would count. How does this observation translate across different cultures? How much data was analyzed before the “pussified” theory of male behavior was developed?

This, unlike the previous sentance, is not a statement of opinion but an assertation of fact. As a skeptic, I am sure that you would not make such an assertion unless you had a great deal of evidence to support this specific claim.

Is this theory your own, or has it been posited by another researcher? What is the size of the population that was studied in order to demonstrate this statement? I assume, since you are stating this as fact, that such a study has been carried out. Can you describe the experiment which determined that “sexually mutilated” men cannot stand up to women? How were their reactions rated? Was there a control group of intact men? Was the study conducted using double blind methods?

I suppose it is possible that you will claim the above statement has been demonstrated through analysis of population data. As a skeptic, I am sure that you will be rigorous in your analysis, and keen to eliminate possible sources of bias from your study. How large was the sample group used to demonstrate this conclusion? How was the subjects ability to “stand up to the women” measured? Was said measurement done without prior knowledge of the subjects penile state? What methods were used to make sure that the sample group was representative of the population at large?

I trust that you will agree that none of the questions I have posted above are unreasonable, and in fact form the most basic knowledge that a moderately skeptical person would require to form an educated opinion about your theory.

This last statement is a value judgement, and as such I cannot comment on its scientific validity. I can, however, question your conclusion. In what way is it bad for the female and male gender roles to be reversed? What are the societal effects of such a reversal? (This second question, I believe, is scientific in nature and as such I will be expecting emperical evidence should you choose to answer it) Does your opinion on this subject apply only to American culture, or do you feel it is globally valid?
I assume that, although you may not have conducted all of the aforementioned research yourself, you will be familiar enough with the research that was done to intelligently describe the methods and results of said studies. As a fellow skeptic, I know that you will be eager to disseminate knowledge and spark intelligent discussion. Answering my questions may well clear up many misconceptions that exist regarding your work.

As always I eagerly await your reply.

JDT, you are one fucked up individual.

now please, PLEASE fuck off.

Well, it’s my belief that Jack has violated the “Do not be a jerk” rule many times over. However, if you ignore him, I think he will go away. The circ threads have all dropped off the forum pages (at least page 1, which is generally as far as I get unless I’m looking for something specific) and have not been bumped. Yes, Falcon, his comment in the other thread was totally uncalled for. Again, though, he has nothing to add to any discussion other than his obsession, and is certainly not helping the fight against ignorance (or else, Jack, you would have answered Pyrrho12’s well-asked, balanced, reasonable questions instead of fighting over which forum he should have asked them in). For that reason, I have stopped posting to any JDT-related thread, and suggest that everyone who thinks he’s a total jerk do the same.

Primaflora, someone said in another thread that Jack has so many issues, he’s got a subscription. That still cracks me up. :smiley:

Jack,

you’re either an idiot with little common sense or you like to cause a frenzy. IMO you’re a troll. Have you added any value here? No. You’ve just made lame arguement after lame arguement supported by nothing more than invalid references and logic that would collapse toothpicks. Sure you’ve gotten attention, but it’s fading now. Realize in all likelyhood that the door will slam you in the ass soon. (I’m hoping for a Christmas Eve banning. :D)

Methinks his ego was a little bruised when people stopped feeding him in his circ threads, so our little sewer-dweller decided to, shall we say, kick it up a notch?
Just a hunch.

This made everything clear in my mind. JDT is Southern Baptist. Women are suppose to be inferior and he can’t help but hate women that succeed. Probably has a woman boss that’s smarter than he is (so is a stump, but I digress). I’d also bet that his mom ruled the roost at his house and pussified his dad and he still can’t stand it.

Whoa up there a minute, sport. I’m a Southern Baptist. Dunno where you’re getting your stereotypes, but you might want to stock up on some new ones; yours aren’t fresh anymore.

I guess that whole controversy thingy at the convention this past summer was a sham?

JDT, you are a festering pustule on the anal polyps of a syphilitic opossum. I would call you a lickspittle and be done with it, but the vitriolic hatred I see towards humanity in your posts demands that, since I must feed you, I express myself completely.

Your posts could clearly be typed by two monkeys in five minutes. At first I thought you must be a necrophiliac (women must lay absolutely still and never talk about their sexual experiences), but now I am convinced [libelous sentence snipped to protect the Chicago Reader].

::deep breath:: Okay, I’m calmer now.

JDT, if you are so convinced that circumcision is the root of all evil, as you claim, then why don’t you go somewhere that circumsized men are wreaking unbelievable havoc on their fellow man on a daily basis, instead of bitching about it on this message board?

I know. You could go to, say, Afghanistan, take a few Tug-Ahoys, and try and fix up the Taliban. In fact, I suggest you whip it on out in the middle of the central square of the Afghani capital and demonstrate the Tug-Ahoy, so that all those circumsized Muslim men (your words, I believe, from another thread) can learn the joys of foreskin renewal and will stop the human rights abuses they are guilty of.

:putz:

reads thread

pauses

looks under JDT’s name

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

Tuba or whoever did this…I LOVE YOU! What do you want in return? Chocolate? Scotch? Beer?

Oh, I see he got his Christmas present early:

Jack Dean Tyler
BANNED

Fresh baked gingerbread? Sexual…uh, nevermind. :wink:

A small island, perhaps? A new server?

::iampunha starts doing the happy dance::

Maybe we’re giving him too much attention, but fuckit, I don’t care.