Sorry to pit lissener again. I know, you’re all sick of it. I just can’t respond to this in the Great Debates forum and keep the board rules, and I will not allow some fucktard to suggest I’m somehow an enemy of gays and gay rights:
lissener, your response is not only insulting, it’s either stupid or dishonest. I don’t know what your personal problem with the rest of the world is; you’re some kind of antisocial jackass, and the precise reason eludes me, but you sure do seem to have a big time problem, and we’ve all come to accept that and try to get along with you as best we can. You seem to think you’re much smarter than you really are, for one thing, but why you’re such a monumental asshole I don’t understand.
Anyway, that’s the way you are, and so be it, and we live with it. But to suggest that by suggesting Fred Phelps is evil but not as damaging as you believe he is - an argument that any intelligent human being can see can go either way depending on how you define “worst American,” - a term you did not clearly define in your OP and which ios presumably therefore up for debate - I am instead dismissing your life experience and millions of others “like you” (there are that many antisocial jackasses?) is nothing more than a stupid personal insult taken as a shot against a contrary opinion in Great Debates. It’s also preposterous and I won’t stand for it.
If you seriously want to compare which of us is more dismissive of other people’s points of view, I’d be happy to match up with you on that score any day. But I thought what you wanted was a debate on the subject at hand, since you posted in in Great Debates. But apparently people aren’t allowed to disagree with you in Great Debates, suggesting you do not understand the purpose of that forum, and confirming the fact that you’re an antisocial jackass.
I’m curious, actually; just what the fuck is your problem? You must notice by now that in this forum almost everyone either despises you or just tolerates you. You do have one admirer (whose name I don’t recall, my apologies to them) but surely you must think to yourself that there’s some reason you keep pissing people off. Have you come to any conclusions?
While it’s no secret that I think lissener is a jerkass who would sell out his own mother to enhance his glorious ego, I thought he’s been pretty together recently.
That is a pretty snippy response from the SDMB’s favorite poster though. I hope he doesn’t backslide.
You make several kneejerk presumptions in that thread–all of which are, funny you should mention it, insulting to me–and instead of going back and reading for comprehension and reconsidering your mistaken assumptions, you pit me. Cool, good to know there’s one doper who can be relied on to be completely predictable.
You know what, lissener? You remind me of that SNL spoof of the McLaughlin Group, and especially Dana Carvey’s portrayal of McLaughlin. Whenever another panelist makes a point, Carvey-as-McLaughlin yells “WRONG!”
With a mental image like that, it’s no wonder I can’t take you seriously.
I had it explained to me once (by radio personalities Mark and Brian) that a “skit” is something that Cub Scouts do as entertainment at a Pack meeting.
What highly-paid performers do on a broadcast show is more properly termed a “sketch.”
