But, to Gringo. I’m sorry. I’m also sorry for not saying “I’m sorry”. The truth is, I thought my apology was clear to you. I can say (or type) the words. I thought they were implied. If you didn’t see that, ok. My apology is sincere and stands. You do not have to accept it, and please don’t feel obligated to answer one way or the other in this thread. I honestly don’t care one way or the other if you accept it or not.
As to tomndebb, thank you for keeping this on topic. For the record, I don’t have blond hair. We pick user names for many reasons. Martha might be a man who is a big fan of Washington’s wife. Maybe it’s her name. The user name is irrelevant. I said I was a man simply to clarify the confusion in the thread.
As to the other things. All I will say is many of you have proven one point that is indisputable. You are as biased as anyone. Nothing in this world is absolute when it comes to human nature, unless you go to the basics of hunger, shelter, etc. So I try to find some answer in the grey. Some of you claim that I state things that others have used to justify their behaviors. Perhaps that’s true. But are the questions themselves above examination?
For example, I have an Indian friend (from the country of India). He was born here, speaks english, has a great education. Our mutual friends are a rainbow of flavors. He has confided in me, however, that his family is pressuring him to marry an Indian woman. He’s not attracted to Indian women. But the pressure is so great, he feels that unless he is willing to be disowned, or he wants to live alone, he will probably marry an Indian woman.
By relaying that story, does it make me racist? An anti-Indianite? If it does, then I don’t have the same definitions of these words as most of the Jews on this board. But I also know Jewish folks with similar stories… especially my Jewish female friends. Some of them have married non-jews at great personal family sacrifice. Others have married non-jews with no apparent fallout. The majority marry other Jews. To say that doesn’t imply you are “clannish”. It’s an observation. I get the same impression from the Greek culture in this country… admittedly, my personal sample set is small, but movies like “My Big Fat Greek Wedding” do nothing to stem the tide of these cultural characteristics. But I think it is human nature to be around people that are similar to you. Your family and social circles tend to be people of similar backgrouds. That’s life and it’s natural. But can you understand how someone who falls in love with a, say Greek person, and is not Greek themselves, and finds out that because of family pressures that person can’t marry you would see that culture as excluding them? Perhaps not understand and feel ostracized for no reason? And from that, build up an animosity toward that group? It doesn’t matter if it’s warranted… it’s how the person feels. As an extension, it’s how another group feels. It’s like a club that doesn’t want you to belong. You can’t join the fraternity. So resentment builds. If the pre-european Jews insulated themselves from the rest of the population, (if not economically, then socially), and were successful economically as a small minority, can you not admit that this is a perceived “behavior”? I’m not saying the reaction to the behavior is warranted, or it’s even a *bad * behavior. If it’s not a “behavior”, then, what is it? A trait? No, that sounds to genetic. A part of the “culture”? How do you define it?
Is it not at least *possibe * that a large group, of say, the average working Germans wouldn’t feel resentment if their economic situation weren’t as good as a group of Jews? My feeling is that it is not based on religion as much as other factor. Economic jealousy is one of those factors. The haves vs. the have-nots. That’s as old as time. Two cave groups separated by a hill will develop different cultures. If they happen on each other’s food source, my guess a fight would ensue before too long. After all, you have to take care of your own family/group/cavegang first. The loser will resent you.
I’m trying to understand about the European Jews and non-Jews pre-WWII. Beyond that, I’m trying to understand the Jewish culture from a religious and historical sense. I’m trying to understand why Jews have seemingly been singled out by a number of different populations. Does seeking an answer make me an anti-semite?
Throwing around things like “racist” or “anti-Semite” triggers an automatic response from people. The “attacked” feels like they need to defend. The “slurred” feels a need to pile on. Neither one is constructive.
FTR, I am pretty much non-denominational. I have a lot to read and learn. That’s my responsibility, not yours. I will continue to pursue the information I seek, including the sources, books and links provided by folks in this thread. However, this thread is obviously not the place.
Finally, if identifying oneself as Jewish is a cultural, and not a religious identity, then I agree that it’s not in conflict with Church and State. But being Jewish seems to not fall into any one category. To me, it clearly falls within the “Church” part of Church and State. It also falls into others, like “culture” or “heritage”. But it still has a religious component that, in my opinion, precludes this government from giving it an official hyphen, no matter how insignificant it may be to my daily life.
tomndebb, I’m out of this thread. I’ve asked my question and received my answer. I’ve also stated my view on the hyphens. Any other verbage is inappropriate in this thread. I stand as guilty as anyone else here. For that, I apologize.
To the rest, I am not going to respond to anything else. I will start another great debate, or go back to lurking, but I will not stop trying to educate myself. But as someone who doesn’t have a religious or cultural axe to grind… as someone who isn’t as sensitive as you all clearly are to this subject, I have the ability to read ALL sources, not just the ones **you ** agree with, to help me formulate some answer. If you must thrash about to make yourselves feel better, by all means have at it; you will do it without me. I will neither read or respond to any other postings. Your minds are as closed as anyone else’s. Your anger precludes you from helping others, like me, see the whole picture. Your anger is understandable. But I didn’t/haven’t/won’t put you (or anyone else for that matter) on a train to an incinerator. Your venom is misplaced. And your ignorance (like mine to you) is as visible to me as this computer screen. Surely you concede that those that don’t understand history are (potentially) doomed to repeat it? I’m just trying to understand. I am not alone in this pursuit.