You object to being called a war apologist. The defense is I was but I am not any more. Poor baby. You are the most insulting snide prick on the board and you object to apologist. what a fucking joke. Gimme some of your drugs. What are you drinking.
Shut the fuck up. I suspect that **xtisme **and I share few political views, but he seems like a decent enough sort, and hardly deserving of your screed. Perhaps when you grow the hell up and come to realize that reasonable people can disagree, you’ll understand.
He supported the war, and came to realize that it was wrong, and based on false premises. Fuck him for having the stones to admit he was wrong, eh?
Nah. Not even the top ten. Mostly Nerf snark.
Pretty close to it. It purposefully attempts to poison the well of that discussion by accusing xtisme of holding a view which he does not hold and one that carries some negative connotations. I’m not aware of apologist ever being a positive thing or even really a neutral.
I’m honestly not trying to add a new term to our lexicon of warnable insults, but certainly such behavior is not good for the tone of Great Debates and is worth some mild admonishment.
You’re just a troll apologist!
For most of it’s life, “apologist” referred to someone who simply defended or explained a particular position or person. Only lately has it come to have negative connotations.
xtisme The Jungle People do not hear the monkey’s in the trees. Why do you let that retarded little monkey get to you? This is a guy who hates the religious because they are hateful, after all, remember? He hates 90% of the people alive, and yet chastises people on the very same subject.
He clearly cannot comprehend the effect on morale that having nukes on the table brings. Nukes are scary, if you take them off the table, they are less scary. Their effectiveness is based on the fear of their use. He cannot comprehend the notion that we went in, and so now we need to follow through for better or worse. I think you were terribly wrong for supporting the Iraq war in the first place, but you’re right to think we have a responsibility to try and see it through. We went in there and fought someone else’s revolution for them. Colonialism is a dirty business, but we can’t just go in there and experiment and then forget about it a few years later.
Der Trihs is a moron with very little capacity for critical thought. His opinion simply is not equal to yours. He is your intellectual inferior by many orders of magnitude. He deserves pity, not respect. Do not respect him so much as to think that when he calls you an apologist it carries any weight.
I think it’s contextual. It’s negative depending on who you are defending and who is making the claim of apologist. For Der Trihs to call him an apologist is definitely a negative connotation. We’ve almost completely obliterated the notion of context. So many dollar words have been colloquialized by 25 cent intellects that we cannot recall that context drives meaning more than the word itself. By the definition you are using Xtisme is certainly an apologist, whether or not it is negative is dependent upon whether or not the person perceiving him as an apologist thinks that the think he is defending is a negative.
But then Der Trihs could call xtisme a Iraq War supporter, and that would be an insult.
I am simply responding to the statement that “apologist” *never *had any connotation other than a negative one.
Thanks. You’re the ginchiest.
Give me a break. xtisme has been openly against the war for a good long time and for a poster who frequents GD as often as Der Trihs not to know that just shows that he either a.) pays no attention to anything but his own blustering or b) has blinders on the size of Wisconsin. And, yeah, calling someone an “apologist” today for having at one time supported military action years ago is retarded.
Now as it happens I don’t think an accusation of apologist automatically rises to the level of a warnable offense, either. But I do think it is close enough to the line that a mild admonishment to tone it down would be reasonable.
But that doesn’t changes the fact that Der Trihs is habitually a jerk, if not necessarily a troll.
shrugs
xtisme shouldn’t let it get him down. Right or wrong, he’s actually giving a greater depth of thought to his positions than Der Trihs.
Back when I had hair, maybe.
Indeed. Banning jerks is always a good idea, IMO.
Daniel
Personally, as a longstanding supporter and former member of the Armed Services, with deep family traidtion in the US Army dating back to WWII and invloving every single war since then, I love it when DerMoron calls me and others like me murderers.
It warms the cockles on such a cold, snowy day here in flyover country.
<<swirls brandy>>
Yeah! Then he won’t bave any place to post his bullshit. Give it some time, and he’ll get sick of surfing tentacle porn or whatever. Then he’ll pretty much have to leave his mom’s basement and see the world. He’ll get a bit more well-adjusted, and then he’ll be able to talk to real live people! Without pissing them off! He’ll be on a roll. Perhaps one night he’ll be at a coffee shop and run into a nice-looking girl, and then next thing you know they’ll be seeing each other. There’ll be a small wedding and a couple of childr . . .
Ummm . . .
Errrr . . .
You know, let’s keep him around. Just on the theory that things could always be worse, ya’ know?
If that’s a general offer, I’ll have a large Scotch, thanks. Just a spoonful of water.
Please don’t defame my state by mentioning Der Twit and Wisconsin in the same post!
the guys insufferable and why he’s not been banned yet is beyond me. Like left hand said, just the “don’t be a jerk” rule, should have been sufficient… multiple times.
No! Let’s go on with this!
And one day, he’ll look adoringly at his wife and new baby and whisper “Thank You.” And then-
ROAD TO DAMASCUS, THE SCALES FALL OFF, HALLELUJAH!!!