Dad vibes, political experience, and football coach. I imagine that that last one will resonate with a lot of Americans, even those who aren’t necessarily Democrats.
He voluntarily joined the National Guard and continued to serve during wartime. He honorably served out his enlistment contract. And then some. He then used his earned GI Bill benefits to go to college. He gets disparaged for “only” giving up a few weeks or months out of any given year, for twenty years of his life to volunteer when very few do?
He is getting disparaged because he rose all the way to the highest enlisted rank where he was the top enlisted soldier in his battalion but he left his unit and retired immediately after they got orders to deploy to Iraq. Leaving a hole at the top of their leadership the had to be hastily filled by someone else. He’s being disparaged because he calls himself a retired CSM despite the fact that it was a conditional promotion and he didn’t meet the conditions. He left before the promotion became permanent and retired as a master sergeant.
I spent 4 years of my life on active duty and another 23 years in the guard. You don’t have to tell me about what is sacrificed. The problem is that also gives me insight into the culture. There is a long standing stereotype of the senior NCO or officer who likes staying in for the extra pay and benefits, who loves the good ol boy network and beers at the end of drill but when they have to put it on the line and actually go into harms way they chicken out. I’ve seen it many times. A CSM leaving his battalion on the eve of their deployment is a very bad thing.
Here is an article from the New York Post. Obviously not an unbiased source. It’s about information posted on social media in 2018 when he ran for governor. Despite the source of the cite and the obvious axe to grind from the original source, I haven’t found anything to dispute the underlying facts and dates.
I followed a link from Walz’s Wikipedia page about this (from 2018), and found an archived article. In short, the Minnesota National Guard says that it’s kosher that Walz says that he served as a CSM.
Just watched that whole video. It gave me hope and, as much as I hate to admit it (because I identify as grumpy, gruff, and non-emotional, with my soft heart DEEPLY hidden) it kinda brought tears to my eyes in spots.
“Joy”
“Neighbors”
“Forward not back”
These are all beautiful sentiments. I’d wear a T-shirt and plaster on a bumper sticker with any or all of them.
Technically right is the best kind of right. “Served as” sure. “Retired as” or “Retired CSM” no way. He retired as a MSG. But that’s not close to being as important as leaving his unit as they were preparing to go to war. That’s why I’m seeing tons of vets online saying fuck this guy. They don’t care what it says on his retired ID card. They care that he abandoned his unit. Would they vote for the ticket anyway? Probably not. But my point is citing his military record is not going to have the effect some think it will. Especially as a counter to Vance who did deploy.
FWIW, since it seems like the Republican Party’s anointed is now trying to pretend Iraq was somehow Biden’s (?) Folly, maybe declining to go to Iraq—if that was in fact Walz’s reason for leaving the Guard—should be considered a positive among voters of all stripes? See, for example:
But, yeah, no. Not gonna worry too much about what the NY Post says. I appreciate you’re citing it as evidence of what is being said and not necessarily what is true (although you have indicated you are somewhat accepting of the premise yourself), but still…
Personally, as someone who volunteered to go to Iraq, I wish I hadn’t. It was an immoral war, and it speaks to a flaw in my character that I not only went, but actually wanted to go.
All that to say, having spent only 14 years in the military myself (but all of it active duty), I’m just fine as an American with a vote seeing Walz point to his service which happily did not involve serving in an unjust war. Spend 20+ years helping your neighbors deal with natural disasters, then pull the chord and get out before occupying someone else’s country? Hell yes, I approve.
Good for you. I don’t. As the Battalion CSM you are the daddy of the soldiers in the unit. You don’t abandon them when things get dicey. You certainly don’t do it for personal gain. He didn’t take a stand against the war. He left to concentrate on his campaign for Congress. The casualties in his battalion didn’t get that chance.
J.D. Vance delivered a rally speech Tuesday in Pennsylvania with a backdrop that made it appear he was campaigning for his arch nemesis, Kamala Harris.
The unfortunate signage appeared to stem from the event’s advance team not accounting for its crowd blocking half of a gigantic poster that sat directly behind Vance, which appeared to read in full, “KAMALA CHAOS.”
For those watching on Fox News and other broadcasts, however, the only words clearly visible—in white text on a blue background, in all caps—was simply “Kamala.”
I watched the rally too, and the military experience was mentioned, but not played up as much as the teaching social studies, and coaching football. Nothing wrong with military experience, but I think the “teaching and coaching high schoolers” will resonate with a lot more Americans nowadays. Especially if he coached football, the quintessential American sport (and I say that as a Canadian Football League fan).
Those are indeed fantastic clips, thanks for posting! Personally, in the space of about 18 hours I’ve gone from thinking “Walz is a great choice!” to a sort of ebullient “This man is an incredible treasure!”. Much of that came from watching videos of the campaign event in Philly.
Let me repeat, in part, something I said in the original thread:
Walz’s genial good nature and progressivism seems to highlight more than ever, in very stark terms, the difference between Team Harris and Team Trump, essentially the difference between competence and compassion versus ignorance and pure evil. It’s astounding to me that Americans have to think about what choice they should make.
America is truly at a crossroads. Failing to elect Harris-Walz would not only be a missed opportunity of epic, historic proportions, but the Trump ticket would surely send the nation down the path of darkness. This is literally an election of historic proportions like no other in our lifetimes. Harris found herself in this position by happenstance, but she’s performing superbly, and her choice of running mate couldn’t be more perfect!
Your latter point is what worries me. I’ve stated elsewhere that Trump claims to be unaware of what Project 2025 entails, but he knows what it means, and as a payback to those who support him (many Project 2025 fans), he’ll implement what they want.
Which means that the United States will basically become the Republic of Gilead, as depicted in The Handmaid’s Tale, by Margaret Atwood. Of course, American women today are not afflicted with the [something? nuclear bomb? something? pandemic?] sterilization that made fertile women in Gilead so prized in Atwood’s novel. But Gilead is what Project 2025 wants, and Trump is too stupid to understand that, and he will say that he will deliver it, just to get votes.
I have many American friends and relatives in the United States. If they feel the need to come here to Canada, I will do my best to help them.