Karl Rove half-resigns -- what does this mean?

They were all relatively anonymous bit players, many who had been swept up in the Whitewater net, a damaging episode for all involved, democrat and Republican alike. Most knew none of those folks by name before, and so there are few surprises in the blase reaction to their pardons. Ken Starr’s excesses leant a legitimacy to Clinton’s, to some extent, even when some of the pardoned had nothing to do with any of it.

If Libby were convicted and pardoned, I doubt many would raise much of a fuss. Rove is a much more important, well-known, and divisive character. He’s “Bush’s brain”, after all, a policymaker as well as a strategist, a man with unprecedented influence and access for a deputy Chief of Staff. His contributions to the current success of the Republican Party are inestimable. A Rove pardon would be, I think, in a far different class than the Clinton pardons.

Luskin’s a lawyer. He didn’t say Rove wasn’t a target. He said Rove wasn’t targeted for prosecution over the particular subjects he’d be testifying over in his fifth grand jury appearance.

Well, the TurdBlossom will just be bumped back to the compost heap to cool out and grow his muscular tentacles a bit more, but will soon be back to spread his particular greasy manner of vicious lard across the land soon to the alarmed masses.

A mere shuffling of a sad ink-smeared stacked deck of cards…