I also magically stopped you from posting those answers you totally have because you’re not trying to annoy people.
No one is forcing you to reply.
No, you’re just distracting and irritating. Back off moron, I’ll reply whenever it is convenient to me.
So stay on the edge of your seats, everybody! It’s coming any minute, right after Pedro sleeps, goes to work, buys some new toe socks, licks some toads and stares at his hands on the old school playground for a few hours. This is definitely what people do when they have a simple and logical argument: they get distracted over and over and tell people ‘I’m coming back soon!’ Back off and give Pedro space for his exegesis about the Dorner case, everybody.
Still trying to play to the crowd, I see, like the loser you are.
You’re just distracting and annoying now. And a sour loser.
For a while it was fun bitch-slapping you though. So thanks for that!
I know it often takes me days to respond to simple questions. One time it took me a week to figure out what I wanted for lunch. Saying stuff is hard!
I can’t even figure out what you all are fighting over. Something something Dorner something.
I relish the thought that your embarassing loser behaviour will be forever here for anyone to see. Please never go dark SDMB.
Nothing really. Pedro sorta kinda thinks this is the LAPD’s fault and Dorner’s been wrong and his murders might be understandable, but he won’t say how or why because it’s dumb and because at best it’s an ‘I hate the cops’ gut reaction. He’s too embarrassed to admit it, so he’s pretending he has some great arguments he hasn’t gotten around to posting and is trying to cover the embarrassment with lame insults. Now he’s finally resorted to the ultimate in ironic tactics: saying someone you’re arguing with on the Internet is a loser.
[Moderating]
Your assumption is incorrect. Knock it off.
[/Moderating]
Man, I just can’t seem to look away and miss all these nuggets of wisdom you’re dropping. My fault really.
By the way I’m certain you are a loser off the Internet too. If only.
Dumb rule but OK, I apologize to you then for my incorrect assumption, since you were fair and square with me before. However there is nothing to knock off, since I didn’t think I was breaking any rules.
Interesting take…
Just to clarify, this wasn’t the LAPD, but the Torrance Police Department.
Allow me the first to express disapproval of killing innocent people due to gripes over racism. In fact, I disapprove of killing guilty parties too (being against the death penalty and all). Nor do I approve of blowing up train stations or buses, for that matter, whether ex-head of states are in them or not. Well, perhaps abandoned train stations for the purposes of demolition.
You mean the “knock it off” thing" I said? I think it’s clear I was talking about intent. Anyway it’s not very important and it could have been phrased better.
Miller, sorry. I will be more careful from now on.
No, it’s the “fuck you” that’s against the rules.
From Ed.
Here’s the whole post from 2009.
SAME TO YOU, PAL.
Fuck you, clown! That’s what I shoulda said…
To recap we’re at the point where Pedro has said (pages ago) that he think Chris Dorner “represented what the LAPD should stand for.” He has gathered this opinion by reading Dorner’s manifesto. He believes what Dorner is saying in his manifesto to be true. Basically that the LAPD made Dorner this way, so the murders are wrong, but his manifesto is right.
I, and others on this board, have read the manifesto too and decided that he was unstable for being a cop to begin with.
We are waiting to hear why Pedro got the impression from this manifesto that he got.
I know. I think Vinyl Turnip was implying… something? Anyway if you squint really hard my “knock off” addendum could make the whole thing seem insincere and I really meant to apologize because Miller is correct, I did err, twice. So:
Miller, sorry. I will be more careful from now on using that curse word, never directed at other posters.
Oh crap, now I think I may be swinging it involuntarily into sarcasm! :eek: