Mellifluous Magdalene opined:
Ah, you are assuming that I have a man. No, alas, I am unattached. Don’t let my absence from the “I’m single, please, will someone, anyone, pretty please, love me?” threads fool you.
AH…having read back, and forward, and back, and forward…mmmm, and back, and forward…what was I talking about? Oh yeah. The man thing. Right. Okay. Anyhow, I would be ahppy, now that I understand, to drag the hub along, and I’m sure we would both do everything in our non-insubstantial power to make you unable to effectively ambulate for an extended period of time.
She continued, in her inimitable way…
It is both a hijack and not a hijack. We are making all of zen101’s fears about his own inadequacy come true. Not even his posts can hold our attention! At the first sight of a luscious woman, we lose all interest in him and focus only on each other.
Then again…it could be that he spoke up in the hopes that a couple of women would virtually “go at it” for his benefit, thinking they were rebelling when they were actually feeding his fantasies.
Then again, I don’t mind feeding someone else’s fantasies as long as mine the the main course and his/hers/theirs get tables scraps. Except for you, of course, in this instance.
And closed, making us all burst into tears, with:
With an evil grin and a conspiratorial wink
Me, I’m all about some evil wink and conspiratorial grin. We can have both, right?
Then again, isn’t that what this is all about?
Enderw23 contributed:
Look, some of us are desperately trying to get work done this afternoon. You two posting your lesbian fantasies ain’t helping the situation too much.
<<<pathead>>>
<<<<duck and run>>>>