or at least filing so he will be able to. Him vs. Schwarteneggar would be the coolest debate ever!
Also James Trafficant launched anexploritory committee to run for president, and he is currently in jail. I don’t see why i have to wait until i’m 35 to run while convicts can run for president willy-nilly.
(i looked pages ahead and didn’t see these, so i hope this isn’t a redux)
Flynt vs. Schwartzenegger for governor of California would definitely be a prime symbol of Dadaist absurdity in post-modern, late capitalist America. Maybe throw Hunter S. Thompson into the mix for some extra weirdness.
My husband told me that when I woke up this morning and I thought it was some kind of weird dream until I saw this post. But gatopescado has a point, you know where you are going with Larry Flynt. However I have to honestly say there’s no way I’m going to vote for him.
I’ve long since given up voting for “most qualified” and am now getting behind whichever candidate is most likely to turn CA government into “The Jerry Springer Show.”
A buddy of mine is planning on running as a candidate for the newly formed Blue Party. Flynt, though, is actually someone whose philisophy I like, a true roots Libertarian. I’d vote for him.
Two hundred candidates! What a fucking show that will be. I can’t wait. No run-offs either. The most votes wins.
When Bush and Gore ran for President, I pointed out in a thread that we had two candidates whose names were associated with sex (Bush) and violence (Gore).
With Schwartzeneger and Flynt, the figurative has become the literal.