Does this involve a random show in the TV show Columbo showing something that later was used in court? No. Note: I remember an incident where someone proved they were innocent because they were at a baseball game that happened to appear in a movie.
I’m guessing it was the copyright trap of Columbo’s first name being Philip (It was actually Frank) published in a book of facts that was plagiarized by Trivial Pursuit.
Parker Brother’s Trivial Pursuit had a question about Columbo’s real name. TP gave the wrong answer of “Philip.” The wrong answer came from Fred’s book of trivia, which had a wrong fact purposely added to prevent copyright theft. The Columbo clue proved the creators of the game had mined Fred’s trivia book in the creation of their trivia.
Here we go
Despite exploring Antarctica, serving during the Spanish-American War, Boxer Rebellion and declared missing-in-action during World War I, he never existed.
Not a human therefore not a female.
It is fictional and from a book, however it was written in a way to make it seem authentically historical.
I cannot know who has heard of him. His identity is not a secret if that is what you mean.
It is not an animal.
Was possession of the item passed from one individual to another one or more times? That is, it was associated with more than one character, but just one at any given time?
If so:
When the item changed hands, was it an impersonal transaction, such as a sale or trade, lost in a poker game, lost and/or stolen, etc.?
Was it passed down within a family, from one generation to the next?
Does “he never existed” simply mean that “he” is from a book and not real life? Or did “he” never exist within the context of the book? (I.e., talking stuffed animals exist within the fictional world of Winnie-the-Pooh, but Heffalumps and Woozles probably do not.)
Is “he” an inanimate object (within the book)? If yes – an object representing something animate, like a teddy bear or toy soldier? Would most people see “he” as an appropriate pronoun, as opposed to “it”?