Liberal's Prospective Suspension/Banning

And yet, here you are with us. People post to what interests them. Lib is very often interesting, in a massive, ten car pileup kind of way. As John Mace said, good gossip is something everyone enjoys.

So…you really think he was asking to be ignored? Wow. I think you may have totally misinterpreted that ATMB thread. And of course I lack a life. I have two kids and work ten hours a damn day. Why the hell else do you think I’m here?

I agree with others who have said that this is a poor description of libertarianism. Asking a private citizen to help you out is in no way a hypocritical act for a libertarian. As for melodramatic, if he made his request privately, there’d be no drama; I do not presume to guess as to his reasons for wanting the ban sooner rather than later.

QED, I guess we do have to agree to disagree. And on such a weighty matter, too…

Daniel

No, only those who want to get their last useless condemnations in on a guy who’s already left. That’s who constitutes most of this thread, if you’ll notice.

And, since you bring up the OP, Shodan, for his pitiful whining about having one less flaming nutjob to keep him company.

That’s what announcing his departure means, or should mean. What’s unclear about that?

That’s for you to say. But obviously this is the best thing you have to do right now.

Whence the veiled hostility? I never claimed it was a matter of any great import. You saw fit to argue the issue with me; should I have ignored you? :confused:

“last”? Honestly? You really think he won’t be back? Hell, you think he isn’t reading this now while not cookied? Elvis, I can’t agree with you here. I doubt very much lib is capable of the actions you’re ascribing to him. He may not have signed in, but I’m willing to wager a large chunk of cash he knows exACTly what’s going on.

Whaaaa? I didn’t insult Shodan. All I did was point out that he was fully aware of where this thread would end up. Take a breath, dude. I always say what I mean.

And it’s so kind of you to take time out of your busy schedule to point this out to us.

I believe that was a response to me.

I am always amused when people with 10,000+ posts suggest that other people do not have a life. :slight_smile:

I don’t mean any veiled hostility; I only meant that given how trivial the matter is, agreeing to disagree on it is no big deal. I was kinda making fun of myself for even bothering to argue the issue, is all.

Daniel

Ah, gotcha. Well, it was an entertaining excercise, if nothing else. :wink:

I don’t think so, although I hope so.

Lib doesn’t list his e-mail in his profile - understandably, IMO, given the inexplicable level of venom he incurs. But I do very much want him to stay/return after a breather.

And now I regret it, since Lib doesn’t go into the Pit. I should have done ATMB, perhaps.

Regards,
Shodan

It doesn’t look like they* have honored his request.
He has refrained from posting on his own since the request: His last post.
Looks like he is doing a good job on his own. If so more power to him and good going.

Jim

  • Admins

That’s not what I heard.

I’m not an authority on Liberal’s motives. I don’t know if even he knows why his request was posted in public.

I do know that “drama queen” is an easy label for anyone who acts out the need for love and attention. That need is also human nature. People who are starved for it are that way for reasons which are beyond us.

If we assume we are being manipulated into giving attention, the appropriate response is to disengage – ignore. It isn’t to shower the person with negative attention.

I just can’t make any such assumptions with the little information that I have. Some of you with more scientific minds may have keener insights that allow you to assault with confidence.

Unless, of course, they HAVE honored his request by secretly disabling his ability to post without changing anything overtly in his member status field. It’s a win-win-win situation:** Lib** gets break he needs and the disabled posting privileges he wants to keep him off the boards without alerting the whole board it’s been done; no one else will be able to prove one way or the other whether he’s staying away from the SDMB on his own voalition or not; and the mods can grant the request easily without engendering much controversy. It’s Solomonian in its perfection as a solution! All you’d need to spoil things is some smartass neo-muckracker to put two and two together and post his suspicions.

Yup. That’s the theory I’d post, if I had one. Unless a moderator or admin comes along and flat out says that’s not so. We’d all believe that, right? Right? :smiley:

So…would now be a bad time to point out that there was 9 hours between Miller’s post and yours, and the thread may very well have just fallen off the page if you hadn’t felt the need to come back and tell us all to shut up and leave poor liberal alone?

I did not say that, Maureen. I am responsible only for things that I actually say.

I make most of my posts late in the day.

It is unseemly to attack those who cannot respond.

:wink: :smiley:

You bumped the thread.

Maureen’s point stands.

And Guin, SAFTK. You heard it here first. [sub]I keed, I keed.[/sub]

If Zoe hadn’t done it, I would have. Note that our posts were a couple minutes apart, and I was typing mine at the same time she was, she just hit SUBMIT first. This thread had no chance of dropping off the page today before us late night posters did our thang. Mwah ha ha ha.