As a male:
Ok, why not start modding that?
Skald starts a thread titled:
“Friend A asks you to persuadeFriend B not to break their engagement. Do you try?”
and puts in this:
In particular, she shot a gonzo scene in which she not only was verbally and physically abused by the director and male models on camera, but also confessed to having been molested by a funny uncle when she was much younger. Eliciting this confession from her — and making her call her mail co-stars "Uncle " while she cried— was the highlight of the scene.
When as Sunny Daze points out he could have just said “she did some porn”.
Yet Skald goes on to mention how the woman is degraded and humiliated and it makes her cry and to that Skald says:
Shortening of the post is mine but if anyone actually reads what has been quoted and said here will know that I am not taking that out of context.
Would it honestly be a horrible thing to have him put in a disclaimer IN THE TITLE that said, “Hey, here, fellow peeps, I have a hypothetical for you about a thing but there is some woman abuse and degradation involved that excites me”* in the title? So that those of us who do not want to read about such things is clear and that we can steer clear of such threads?
Is a simple warning (not of the poster) for that kind of content too much to ask for?
Is a simple “thread contains abuse of women” too much to ask for?
I am not about squanching free speech but please, a labeling of speech surely isn’t squanching it.
*I am not attacking Skald. He himself said it:
and as others have pointed out he has admitted in the past the these things excite him but do I really need to go beyond this one admission?
Mods? Is it really, really that hard to ask for people who want to fantasize about the abuse of women be labeled as such?
I have many women, strong, intelligent women, that I would gladly give my life for that I would be ashamed to show these boards to based on this instance alone.
What harm would it do to have Skald label his posts as things that they actually are?
Such as:
“Here’s a hypothetical about some flowers?”
or
“Here’s a hypothetical about some flowers that also include some degradation of women?”