[QUOTE=Wee Bairn]
You’ve never done something whilst on drugs that seemed like a good idea at the time, and then regretted it?
[/quote]
On drugs, yes. (Klonopin, FWIW. And alcohol, but that’s another story.) On coke, no. Not all “drugs” are the same. If you’re going to argue that all drugs turn people into “addled idiots” who will agree to anything because it sounds like a good time, how do you account for the fact that thousands of people who eat Vicodin or Lortab every day on a doctor’s orders, don’t go shooting porn videos for fun?
I stand by my assertion that a couple lines of coke will not make Ms. Lohan suddenly susceptible to the suggestion of starring in a porno. The “impaired judgment” that’s often given as a negative effect of cocaine is not at all the same thing as the “impaired judgment” caused by other drugs. Alcohol is the king of “impaired judgment” drugs–rather than being an indirect effect, it’s virtually a guarantee, if you drink enough liquor in one night. The fact that Ms. Lohan has imbibed seemingly Herculean amounts of liquor and there’s still no porno, not even an ill-gotten sex tape, leads me to believe that no drug will make her do that by itself.
That’s a different question entirely. From my experience with the black market, BTW, anyone who has that much coke to offer doesn’t need to make porn; and if he does, it’s for his own amusement, not as a business venture. Which means that he’d be offering drugs for sex, not porn. That she would agree to that when the money ran out, well, I wouldn’t be surprised.
As for the porno side of it, if you’re asking: “When Lindsay Lohan has no career to speak of, has blown all of her money on coke, and needs more cash to supplement her raging habit, could she desperately run to porno?” That’s a definite yes. But what you said was:
I call BS on that.
True and true. I certainly have no illusions about changing the double standard in a CS thread, this just seems like a perfect time to lament it.