I would have thought a list of all current Congresscritters with their NRA rating would be easy to find. I would have been wrong. The lists I can find are all old.
Is there any obvious way to compile a list of governors and members of Congress based on their attitudes towards guns? This ought to be easy.
Do you want NRA ratings, or do you want the candidates’ positions? So far as I can tell, the NRA’s evaluation consists entirely of “does the person have a D or an R after their name?”.
Well, I am arguing elsewhere on the internet. I was hoping for an easy way to generate a list of progun Democrats. The NRA ranking would just be a means to that end.
(Let me see if I can go at it the other way, got to an anti-gun group for their ratings.)
Assuming one isn’t for banning all handguns, there’s nothing hypocritical about supporting some increased gun control measures and owning a gun. If they own an AR-15 with a 30 round magazine and want to ban AR-15s and 30 round magazines, then that’s hypocritical, but not simply owning a handgun while being broadly in favor of gun control measures.
I would challenge this by changing the issue from gun control to abortion. Is there room for someone to be labeled “pro choice” yet support restrictions on abortions? Maybe there is… As a litmus test for a candidate however, I can’t think of any D seriously running for President who is considered pro choice but supports any of the new laws being passed across the nation or any real restrictions on abortions. I feel the same to be true considering gun control.
I think it is difficult to call someone a “pro gun” candidate who supports any increased gun control measures, or being broadly in favor of same. They are neutral at best and whether they own guns personally is neither here nor there for me.
It looks like someone else has posted a list of pro gun candidates so if this is a hijack, please disregard.
Comparing gun owners (or gun rights activists) to (routinely brutalized and even murdered) black people and civil rights activists strikes me as, at best, indicative of a gross misunderstanding of history.
I wasn’t quibbling with not calling them “pro-gun”, just implying that they are hypocrites. It’s not hypocritical to be in favor of restrictions on abortion, unless one has (or helps a daughter/girlfriend/wife have) an abortion that would be illegal under those restrictions.
Thank you. My, wasn’t that harder to find than you would have thought? People talk about NRA rankings all the time, but it is hard to find a clean list.
Someone can be pro-<something> and still support reasonable restrictions on <something>. Someone who calls themselves pro-<something> and supports unreasonable restrictions on <something> is hypocritical. The point of contention is just which restrictions are reasonable. And on any issue, there will always be a few loud folks who call any restrictions at all unreasonable.
Eh, the GOA is more likely to base ratings on their party, so much that NRA As get Fs from them. Not that the NRA’s ratings are necessarily honest.
I don’t think that’s from February consieridering Heitkamp was out of office in January. Also no current political position, but Jim Webb was the most recent one to run a campaign for President.