I have seen recently that Skywest are advertising in Australia for pilots. The blurb talks about “great pay” and various other benefits. Sounds great! Unfortunately it seems that “great pay” equates to less than half as much as what a similarly qualified pilot would get in Australia, but it is hard to tell without knowing what the cost of living is like in the USA.
So here’s the IMHO question: Is $34,000 - $41,000 per year a living wage in the USA? Is it good? Bad? Great?
Agreed. It’ll get you a lot farther in, say, Birmingham, Alabama, than it will in Chicago or San Francisco.
It’s also going to be dependent on that person’s household situation. A single person without much debt? It’s probably not bad, unless they’re living in a major city – and, similarly, if the person has a spouse or partner making a similar amount, it’d help a lot.
If, on the other hand, the person is a sole breadwinner, and has dependents (children, a stay-at-home spouse), it may not go very far.
I guess by “living wage” I mean being able to sustain a comfortable life style, own a house, car, big TV, stereo, eat out once a week, and drink a few beers occasionally.
As for where, they have bases at the following:
Atlanta
Boise
Chicago O’Hare
Denver
Detroit
Houston
Los Angeles
Minneapolis
Palm Springs
Phoenix
Portland
Salt Lake City
San Diego
San Francisco
Seattle
Tucson
Are any of those particularly expensive or cheap to live in?
Generally speaking, the bigger the city (in the continental U.S., anyway), the higher the cost of living.
There are lots of websites that do comparisons of relative costs of living in different cities. I found this one; it’s a world site, and it uses Prague as its baseline – so, the absolute numbers are indexed to Prague (which probably doesn’t help you wrap your head around what the numbers mean), but the relative numbers give you an idea.
From your list, New York, San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles, Chicago, Denver, and Minneapolis are all in the top 25 highest cost-of-living indices for North American cities on the site I found. Boise’s down at #97.
If we’re talking about a couple with two young children (and one of them is an airline pilot, who I assume will often be away from home), childcare can be a not-insignificant expense.
Especially if they’re relocating to the U.S. from Australia, which’d very likely mean that they wouldn’t have any family locally who could help them out with childcare (i.e., no grandmother who can watch the kids in the afternoon while mom and dad are working).
So, two pilots, earning a total of between $70K and $80K, but in addition to the expenses of having two young children, it sounds like they might possibly need to hire a full-time, live-in childcare person. This isn’t exactly my area of expertise, but it doesn’t exactly sound like they’re going to be living comfortably, especially if they’re in a bigger / more expensive market.
According to this website airline pilots starting salary is in the range of $20,000 to $40,000 annually. I’d think experienced pilots would want at least $40,000 a year based on those figures. And even that is a pretty meager living for someone with special skills. This websiteconfirms the starting salaries but also cites much higher salaries for experienced pilots. Perhaps $34,000 - $41,000 is a good starting point for a pilot with only a year or two of experience. It could be the start on a track to a six figure salary some day.
Yeah the figures I quoted are from Skywest. Working their guaranteed 76 hours per month and earning ~$38 - ~ $45 depending on years of service. You get more if you do more hours of course.
A local retail store here is touting that it’s now paying employees a “living wage.” According to their marketing spiel, that works out to $9.50-$11 / hour, 30 hours a week. I was like… :dubious:
Granted, my town is not as expensive as a big city, but it is the largest town in the area, and has enough competition for housing that it’s not dirt-cheap. $11/hour for 30 hours/week works out to a high of $1320/month before taxes. I don’t know how one could pay rent, car payment (mass transit here is awful), food, & health care on that, much less any extras (savings, children, etc.) Maybe you’re not starving, but you’re not exactly comfortable either.
You could live in the south Chicago suburbs with that par range. Your house would be small, and your commute to the city would take over an hour each way. This assumes, as mentioned above, that your health insurance was taken care of for you. (If you have to pay for it yourself, forget owning a house on 30-40 grand a year.)