Like you, I am basing my comments on personal experience. Granted it was in Florida in the late 1970s, while the state was being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the 19th century.
Our son was only a month old when we separated, and I moved to be awarded custody based on a mountain of documentary evidence. She made up a bunch of lies out of thin air, and the judge, with the Wisdom of Solomon, split the difference. The state at that time held, “The mother gets custody,” unless there is overwhelming evidence to contraindicate that. I had a “Legal Aid” lawyer, and I got my head handed to me. She was awarded “sole care, custody and control,” while I got minimal visitation. When he was 2 years old, his mother buggered off to another city over 200 miles away, leaving her “custodial child” with her parents to raise. Over the years, I sought increased visitation rights, with spotty results.
When he was 6 years old, I decided to sue for “Sole care, custody and control” for myself, with liberal visitation for my ex and her parents. My ex’s parents countersued for custody to be awarded to them. I hired a top-of-the-line attorney, and did all my research and preparation.
My ex told the Court Counselors in Duval County and Hillsborough County she no longer wished to have custody. She told the psychiatrist appointed to the case she no longer wished to have custody. She told the judge in the hearing she no longer wished to have custody. The laws of the State of Florida say that natural parents have primary claim to custody over any third party, even grandparents. It took the court three years, and cost me over $15,000 to settle what should have been an open-and-shut case. Still, the judge gave my ex and her family ten times the access I ever had with my son.
My ex and her family hired the psychiatrist to write what they dictated, and the judge used that “evidence” in formulating his decision, even though the first time I was permitted to see the report was in the final judgment. I was never given the opportunity to rebut, or even comment on, the findings. There were many totally asinine edicts spelled out in the judgment, due to the judge completely disregarding my testimony and that of my witnesses, and putting complete faith in the proven lies my ex presented. When I petitioned to have a clause modified, which stipulated that my son finish the school year at my ex-in-laws’, over 30 miles one-way across town at rush hour, with affidavits signed by his teacher, the principal, the guidance counselor, and the curriculum specialist, all agreeing that the move would be “in the best interest of the child”, the judge dismissed the motion “with prejudice.”
If this were my only evidence, it would be understandable to dismiss it. But the same things happened to friends, relatives and acquaintances in many jurisdictions, including Baltimore MD, Long Island NY, and others, over the span of many decades. It is my impression that this is how the courts do business, as I have been witness to many, many cases very similar to mine, and few, if any, where “justice” played more than a token role in the proceedings.