Truer words hath ne’er been spoken–take it from me, “babe.”
Hmmm…you’re a leggy supermodel…named “Bigguns”…and you have to make “hubby” give it to you twice a day? What’s wrong with this picture?
Seriously, though, we really have no reason to doubt “Bigguns.”
I tried three times to type that with a straight face. I still can’t.
The IQ of a group is equal to the IQ of the dumbest member divided by the number of people in the group.
AuraSeer
3 words for you… GO TO HELL
Me?? an asshole?? You better believe it!
Heather Lee
XheatherleeX@aol.com
Just an aside:
When I am looking at (or thinking about) a woman with lust in my heart, certain physical characteristics do come into play:
eyes
mouth
facial expression
hair
neck
breasts (shape much more important than size)
ass
legs
hands & feet
tummy & back
but way, way, way down on the list is I wonder how tight her quim is?
Am I really that unusual in this respect?
Neck?
Neck?
The IQ of a group is equal to the IQ of the dumbest member divided by the number of people in the group.
MC said to TennHippie:
[quote I note that as superficial as your list is, you didn’t mention age, which has lots to do with the general condition of most everything on your list. - /quote]
TennHippie did make it pretty clear that those physical characteristics have to do with LUST. I don’t think it’s fair to call his list superficial. Few people get lustful due to another’s, say, spiritual enlightenment.
To me, your age comment smacks of insecurity as well. A little sensitive? Some troll can come on the board and claim that someone that’s swinging around a baseball bat has “her” questioning her marriage vows and TENNHIPPIE is being superficial? It appears that he was pointing out that in his mind, the mere size and what-have-you of a person’s genitalia do NOT make them worthy of lust. I agree.
I would ALSO like to point out that any woman that has had sex with a guy who was larger than average and yet did NOT know how to use it will tell you that size alone does not make for a good time. Bigguns is either a porn obsessed man or … well, that’s the only option I’ve been able to come up with so far.
Hands & Feet?
The IQ of a group is equal to the IQ of the dumbest member divided by the number of people in the group.
ChrisCTP: Funny you should mention Con #3. There’s something familiar about the way this post is phrased; some thing about the syntax.
Something** very familiar**…
VERY FAMILIAR INDEED…
YO-HO, ME HEARTIES! ALL HANDS ON DECK FOR THE MUSICAL BATTLE AT SEA!
Yes, Rousseau, my list was of physical traits that figure into the lust factor, as Valerieblaise pointed out. Obviously, the emotional/intellectual complexities of personality traits can also figure heavily into mere lust, and certainly are essential elements for any attraction beyond that.
Rousseau goes on to ask:
Neck?
Hands and feet?
Absolutely. The neck is one of the most sensitive and erotic areas of the body-- especially the female body. The hands and the feet have their uniquely expressive sensual characteristics as well.
Any man who does not know that special place on a woman’s neck, right near where the hairline usually ends (begins?), will NEVER be able to please a woman totally.
Back in my single days, I got a girl to have an orgasm fully clothed in a club with this technique. She could have been lying, but she had no real reason to.
As for the debate on Biggums, let it be known that the probability of someone being a troll lies in a direct paralell to the time it takes the accussed to pop back in the thread after the accusation comes up.
Let’s see… How many days has it been now?
Yeah, I thought so…
Well, let’s see here…
I have often been accused of being a slut, and every time, I cheerfully confirm the fact. I like to fuck, goddammit! I am somewhat picky about who gets to go to bed with me, and I like to be absolutely sure that they don’t have a VD, but once you’ve met my criteria… This little introduction is just to clarify my thoughts on slutty women, which basically amount to, “Are you busy tonight?” The “sluttiness” of the poster is not at issue here. If “she” wants to fuck around, that’s fine. I don’t condone sex outside of a serious, committed, relationship, but I also don’t condone imposing my values upon others.
Now, some women do like men with gigantic penises. I used to think that I was one of them, before I found that an average-sized penis could do anything a large one can, with a lot fewer complications. Most of the women I know agree with me here. A large penis truly is an impressive thing to behold, but that’s about as far as I’m willing to take it. (Yes, I know you thought that I was into girls. I am, but I can get really horny sometimes, and let’s face it, it isn’t nearly as hard to find a man who will have sex with me as it is to find a woman who will on short notice.)
Anyways, doesn’t it strike anyone as odd that this individual has only two posts? I mean, if it was someone we all knew and loved who came to us with this problem, it would be one thing, but “she” just showed up one day, popped this question, and vanished. Now, there are lots of places “she” could go to get this question answered. Aren’t there enough sex-related Q-and-A messageboards “she” could take this to? Why here? Unless… some regular poster is playing around again.
In closing, I don’t know who is doing this, or what “she” hopes to accomplish, but if Bigguns appears again, I am going to ignore “her” and hope that “she” goes away.
Modest? You bet I’m modest! I am the queen of modesty!
grrl – Maybe it is one of our regulars. But maybe, rather than one of us playing around, it was one of us asking a question that she didn’t feel comfortable asking under her own name. This would explain the exaggerated and almost outlandish langauge of the post; she wouldn’t want anyone to recognize her.
neuro – I have a chance? I HAVE A CHANCE? WOOHOO! 
Cessandra-
Hmmm. Hadn’t thought of that.
SanibelMan-
Correct me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t that be statutory rape?
Modest? You bet I’m modest! I am the queen of modesty!
Well, I think that’s a bit of a technicality, don’t you?