I was really worried about this one. Really. I saw it, and I was like, “I can do this one, but If I do, people will think I am an idiot.”
Did anyone catch my errors in grammar here?
All for this :
I bet youre pace in this game
I had / have reason to believe that Telcontar is a Pace.
And, if I could vote Scuba again, I would.
You seemed to favor using a LOT of ““dummy”” t s and a few other letters in excess that were doubles. you had a double b set that wasnt used, etc.
I figured that you needed extra letters to make your Anagrams work. Same for why you didn’t include E in " Tlcontar " E is the most commonly used letter after all.
Meeko, let’s focus on this for a minute. If Telecontar is Charlie Pace (the only character with this name in the canon), then Scuba_Ben is lying and Telecontar knows it. Why wouldn’t Telecontar vote for Scuba_Ben in such a circumstance?
A Pace. Not C. Pace. but rather “” Simon P. “”
your entire "Just putting it out here, - might have been role blocked last night "
I anagramed that to
Tlcontar is Simon P. [dummy letters]
No, no, definitely not. I received no results whatsoever on either pedescribe or Telecontar. Neither role nor alignment for either.
**
omgus mega fishing if there ever was one.**
Again, I was waaaaay off with Pede. I was working on Cardinal Fang with your " DC traffic " comment. This was hard for me, because, well obviously, we now know it simply wasn’t there.
Needless to say, this Fire is out for the time being. Storyteller, if you survive, I will be looking at your new posts again, regardless – It’s the type of person I am.
But, if you guys need a FOS at this moment.
FOS on Scuba Ben.
Could I be wrong here? Sure. Do I give a shit? No.
FWIW : I was asking this after I found a “” Simon P “” to match to Simon Pace. On the Lostpedia, Simon Pace (And two other Simons, not with a P surname) was listed. However, he was listed as a Flashback character. Hence this question.
Meeko, that may be the most brilliant yet completely out there theory that I’ve ever seen in Mafia ever.
I’ll have to remember the anagram thing.
**
I kinda felt I was giving my style away.** Also, If I can help you guys understand me, that will go a long, LONG way for my reputation in Mafia.
Perhaps a Mafia / Peeker Liaison or something.
But, it was asked for. And, also, it was wrong for this game. [[I Think that I hit on Telcontar on Night 2, and, apparently, Storyteller hit him on Night 3. ]]
But, I ran into this on Crimson as well, again, Crimson was my first game, this is my second.
I believe that EVERYONE can breadcrumb in a game. - They WILL have varying reasons to do so. The Cop / Detective / Color Moniker will still have the biggest reasons to do so.
May I remind everyone that, according to storyteller himself,
Furthermore, if storyteller is telling the truth now, it was a pretty big screw-up for him to say that he thought he’d been role-blocked, since it apparently let the Scum know that he was indeed a power role (and thus, a good choice to keep on blocking.
Quoth Telcontar:
Unfortunately, there’s not really much to assess. Usually, when a cop claims, they give us a list, and we can then judge the cop’s claim by how likely we think his investigations are to be accurate, and he can provide further evidence the next day by investigating someone else. Here, though, storyteller has not, for whatever reason, gotten any results to tell us, and probably won’t get any results toNight, either. All he has is asking us to take his word for it.
All that said, I would not be terribly uncomfortable if we lynch Imaginary Fiend, either. If nothing else, we’ll get a lot of information from his death, and my analysis still shows him as more likely to be Scum than most. I’ll want to see a vote list before I decide, since this may need to be another defensive vote for me.
Speaking of which, in reply to cardinal_fang’s vote on me:
I don’t personally trust the runs that include all votes, because it’s too easy for Scum to park a vote on another Scum, and then change it later. I included those results only for completeness, the same way that I include the runs that don’t assume that I’m Town. Which leaves me choosing between folks with the same score, and I thought I could make a stronger case against storyteller at this point.
It’s not just that he opposed it before the rule-change; it’s that he supported it after. A Town player (such as myself) might have mistakenly opposed it at first, and then seen with the rule-change that it was a bad idea after all, but that it’s too late now, but to champion it after it wouldn’t have worked nearly as well?
**Vote Count:
Chronos(4): Jimmy Chitwood, USCDiver, Zeriel, CardinalFang,
ScubaBen(3): ShadowFacts, Meeko, AllWalker
Storyteller(1): Chronos
Imaginary Fiend(2): Storyteller, ScubaBen
Pedescribe(1): Telcontar**
Meeko=A Brilliant Mind
I am presently inclined to believe the various Town claims – which isn’t a very good idea, I know.
Here’s my thoughts on various people, just in case I don’t get back here in the next hour.
Unless a counter-claim shows up, I think we can trust storyteller.
I lean towards believing Meeko as Town, though abrasive.
ShadowFacts is playing aggressively. I lean towards him being Town, but I would appreciate other people’s reviews of my assessment of him, as well as their own assessments.
cardinal_fang is lurking. I have been advised that this generally indicates Town. But lurking is poor play, it doesn’t do anything to confirm the player’s faction. So I couldn’t conclude anything on him in my assessment.
AOP: Chronos, would you like to join my defensive vote on IF?
Chronos had a bad idea, but otherwise seems to be acting pro-Town.
I have no read on AllWalker, Jimmy Chitwood, pedescribe, or Telcontar.
Imaginary Fiend had drawn suspicion early, but lurked Today away. I find this change in behavior very suspicious.
USCDiver hasn’t posted much, at least not that I’ve noticed. I have no read on him.
Zeriel claimed Town, if I remember correctly. I don’t have much of a read on him either, but that’s mainly because I have been dealing Today with ShadowFacts accepting my invitation to put me in the spotlight. (ooh, bright light!)
I think that’s everybody.
So for what it’s worth, I count five players I have no read on. I think we should concentrate on them as well as cardinal_fang, just to get more information about them.
Since Mahaloth might not be on to do it, here’s my count of the votes right now:
**Chronos(4): Jimmy Chitwood, USCDiver, Zeriel, cardinal_fang
ScubaBen(3): ShadowFacts, Meeko, AllWalker
Storyteller(1): Chronos
Imaginary Fiend(2): storyteller, scubaben
pedescribe(1): Telcontar**
Since I won’t accomplish anything at this point by keeping my vote on storyteller, I’m going to
unvote storyteller
vote Imaginary Fiend
Voting Scuba_Ben would be more likely to save me at this point, but I have essentially no case against him, so I’m just going to hope that something swings my way.
Incidentally, by my count, when storyteller said that he was in the lead, I was actually at 4 votes, to his 3.
On preview, I see that Mahaloth was able to post a vote list after all, but he agrees with me.
**AOP ? **
I know the movie. But. uhm, uh. Do you mind elaborating?
I can’t find Zeriel claiming. But I did find Meeko claiming, without posting a role PM, ahead of the rule change: 343, quoting his original claim in #327.
Is anybody keeping a chart of people’s votes and unvotes?
So this is sort of interesting.
Four votes on Chronos, three on Scuba_Ben. An agonizingly-slow-to-develop pseudo-wagon on Imaginary Fiend, who was a popular enough target for votes to have nearly been lynched two Days ago.
I have to leave very soon, so I can’t look it up, but can anyone say off the top of their head: of the player currently voting for Chronos or especially Scuba_Ben, how many have been strongly in favor of name-claiming over the course of the last few Days?
So right now, it’s 4-3-3. Is anyone not yet voting?