Lynn Bodini - study wrecker or Sentinel exposed.

Lynn BodiniDamn! Now why did you close off my thread before I decided to reply? If you noticed, I was being very good there. Besides you screwed up the second of a set of behavioral observation experiments I have been running in order to determine the mean personalities found on the Internet verses the illusion behind the subconscious selection of ‘screen’ persona’s or, rather, names.

Example: What form of person spends the most time on the Internet? What form of person identifies most with their screen name? Average body built and sex of the person. Estimated average intelligence of the person. Cliques in message boards. Cliques in chat rooms. Generated response from such people in the areas of: race, sex, addiction, marriage, dating, global events, international interaction, ‘humor,’ and so on. How are ‘web people’ different from non-web people.

Locate the most aggressive ‘regulars’, board leaders, board followers, potential psychiatric problems, potential social problems, potential social isolation, possible agoraphobiacs. Observe the ‘pecking order.’

In brief: observe and determine the psychology of a test group in a popular board and compare with general web observations to determine the psychology of most ‘confirmed’ web users.

MarkSerlin, Rainbowcsr, AnitaJ, and the others were screen names used not only by myself, but my compatriots in these observations. We had to kind of keep up on what each one said.

It has been most interesting, but not all that conclusive, though it appears so far that the heaviest message board users have somewhat insular personalities, some apparently have only a small click of friends they hang around with and some are unusually aggressive, up to and including ignoring anything that might be factual but does not fit into their opinions.

My other compatriots dropped out, finding the constant harassment annoying. I’ve decided to close things down for similar reasons, but mainly because I have no doubt that any further posts of a radical nature on my behalf will result in the thread being closed down.

I was very disappointed that this last one had to end so soon! I was trying a whole new tact! I was most interested in observing the responses to minor stimulation and more or less passive activity on my part. It would have been interesting to see just how long the respondents would have gone on setting each other off before it would have become necessary for me to insert a carefully passive remark or respond in kind to an attack upon my person.

The SDMB, by the way, has a very noticeable clique with leaders and followers. It is also about the most active and easy to work board I have come across, with most others tending to be those damn lines of listings that one need to click on just to read a single post.

The MOST hostile board is no long up and I’m glad. It was for a discussion of race relations and I actually did discover that Blacks are just as racist and hostile as Whites and just as quick to grasp at the most improbable reasons for being so. HOWEVER in a Black discussion board run mainly by teenaged Black children, I found a heartening, most unexpected turn of events with very little hostility mentioned concerning Whites.

Someday I might tell you of the message board for male and female workers in the sex industry and the fascinating conversations they have. (Word to the wise – don’t try to ‘save’ a professional hooker and make her straight. Most don’t want to be ‘saved’.)

Uh, NightGirl44 was an independent personality, not adjusted by myself and LadyLust was mainly handled by an actual woman.

So, the war is over, folks. I will, however, be watching to see who is next to be attacked, because someone always will be.

To those I offended, my appologies – to some I offended – bite me :D. To those who figure I’m some dumb shit – I won’t post my IQ, because you’d consider me lying. As to my description of myself – it’s real.

By the way, I am a smoker and I am concerned about the no smoking fanatics because the movement has surpassed most others and I’ve caught TRUTH lying twice so far. (Latest lie? They claim a person dies every 8 seconds from smoking related illnesses. That would be three million plus a year. Combine that with the couple of other million who die yearly and, since we have a population of 245 million, there would be such a sizable dent in the population that we would be importing people to work.) I’m interested on how long such lies can be told and civil rights violated while the lawmakers sit back and watch.

TRUTH by the way, is sponsored by TRUTH, which was financed by a grant from the Author D. Moss foundation, which also sponsors various religious things.

:slight_smile:

I hope this means that you’re leaving…


Yer pal,
Satan

TIME ELAPSED SINCE I QUIT SMOKING:
One month, one week, six days, 4 hours, 1 minute and 13 seconds.
1726 cigarettes not smoked, saving $215.84.
Life saved: 5 days, 23 hours, 50 minutes.

I love it when people attempt to excuse acting like a jackass under the cloak of “research”. “Honey, I wanted to see how strong our relationship was, that’s why I cheated on you.” “I treat you like crap because I’m investigating your reactions.” “I create sockpuppets and post a bunch of stuff to piss people off because I’m doing ‘behavioral observation experiments’ ‘in order to determine the mean personalities found on the Internet verses the illusion behind the subconscious selection of ‘screen’ persona’s or, rather, names’.” It’s just a high-faultin’ way of saying “I poke people with pointy sticks to see what they do.” Wiener-boy. I have more respect for genuine jackasses than those who scramble to cover their lack of social skills with psuedo-scientific language. Feel free to extrapolate my IQ, breast size, weight, clique-ness, potential psychiatric problems, et al from my post, as I will speculate about people who like to act smart but don’t know the difference between “tact” and “tack”.

Satan & especially Gaudere: I agree. But, do you guys get a discount on bulk purchases of “Purina Troll Chow”? :smiley:

On Lynn’s wise words:

Anyone know whether this can be attributed? I recall it being used as the punchline to a Dave Allen story, but can anyone (Lynn maybe) say whether it is older?

Sentinel exposed? shudder

picmr

I buy my troll food in thimblefuls (check how often I respond to trolling); but sometimes you just feel you must forcefully cram that food down their throats. ::shrug:: I felt it was worthwhile to say something about regarding real, thinking, feeling people solely as fodder for ridiculously conceived and grossly unscientific “sociological experiments”. Faugh. But I would not take it amiss if this thread were to end here.

Yeah, I hate seeming like I’m tossing table scraps to a troll, but I have to say this…

Sentinal, I read the thread that your OP was talking about… it was quite amusing, and I even chuckled at your grasp of irony. But even so, it was assholic (after all, a lot of those that you were insulting have shown themselves to be quite intelligent and likeable… why insult people like that?) It reminded me of Denis Leary’s standup routines and songs (anyone ever hear “Asshole”?)

If you want to create a study, I’d suggest slipping in a hint about it beforehand. If you want to be funny, I’d suggest saying as such beforehand, or AT LEAST at the end of the post.

This ‘research’ would have ranked right up there with the great work done by Dr. Smith in Lost in Space.

Well, I spend a fair amount of time on the 'net and I certainly identify closely with my screen name.

I hadn’t realized I had so many problems, of course. (On the other hand, if I were going to do a study of a message board–as opposed to simply harrassing its members–I might try to learn how to spell clique so that when I published my magnum opus my readers might actually believe I knew what I was talking about.)

(I wonder if KarrotSoup has moved to Florida from New York?)

yah! research. where actual factual evidence of the truth behind human behavior can be found in message boards. our future is in sentinels hands folks, he’s doing the research that our future depends on so greatly. “how does trolling affect our peers” or “how long can i last on a MB after insulting innocent people because i sure as heck no i wouldn’t last in real life if confronting them this way”

Shades of Karrot Soup…
And I don’t believe it this time either.

Anyone feel like updating those of us newer than Karrot Soup on exactly what that is. I tried the search, it pulled up nothing. Drat.

Was a troll on the AOL SDMB. In the end she told everyone she was conducting psychological research.

Should I be afraid that Serlin lives in my state and that he thinks I am cute as a button?

Can anyone point me to where Serlin actually got himself banned? Enquiring minds, and all that . . .

…or a lack thereof…

And thanks for reminding me of Karrot Soup. I’d forgotten about that one.

Don’t know for sure, but I’d say the first post of this thread. The egregious “comments about people’s appearances” thread was closed, he came over here and basically said he was trolling (even if you believe his “research” story).

picmr

I suppose I will break my rule and post to this thread.

I would like to thank who banned this nut cake, but watch out, remember he has admitted that he has mutiple user names. There maybe others he didn’t list.

Oh and I’d like to add, ** research my ass. **

And if you are still reading, no , you idiot that is not an invitation !

Ask not for whom the funereal bell tolls;
it tolls for thee.

Are you Donne, yet, BANNED?

You know, it may be a little hard to believe that someone could have an IQ equal to that of a rock, but I think in your case we’ll probably believe you, dumb shit.

Just when I didn’t think you could humiliate yourself any further, you come up with this B.S. about research a la Karrot Soup. What a way to grasp at straws.

ADIOS ASSHOLE!