You say you’re playing with a toned down style. That seems fair enough. But like I said, and here we segue into point two, you reverted to form for Blam. By contrast, here’s the entirety of your strong attack against macey:
It’s a vote. It’s a confident vote. But four lines is not a strong attack, especially when you’re the sixth vote. Rewriting your own posting history in the hopes that others will take you at your word is a definite scum tell.
It strikes me that based on this you weren’t really saying anything. Telling people how they ought to go about hunting scum is easy; getting your hands dirty is harder. And you’ve been offering a lot more advice than you’ve been hunting scum. But the original point is that after making some clear Day One posts about not thinking “scum would never do that”, you tried to call me out for being prepared to consider that two different actions could have scum motivation. It’s not consistent.
How does one decide to “start” a wagon? At the point you make the first vote, you have no idea if it’s going to be a wagon or not. First you pointed out that somebody who started a wagon like macey’s would have no chance to get off, then you smear me for suggesting that brewha’s early **macey vote may not be exculpatory for exactly that reason.
Caution is all very well and good. But you said twice that you would review Total Lost, and you never did. Which makes this look less like pro-town caution and more like scum sowing doubt and confusion.