Mafia - Game in progress [Edited title]

No problem, but I appreciate your appreciation. :slight_smile: But I thought ATPG was one of the lynch leaders? Or do you mean the other ones as well? So that would be Chucara and RyJae?

Okay, it’s easy enough to do since unlike ATPG, the others don’t have that many posts.

As for RyJae, it seems as if s/he’s getting dinged mostly for this first post, 187:

I may be reading this wrong, or trying to put too good a face on it, but when I read this, I assumed that the first line was not RyJae claiming “Skimming as a scum tell” as a fact, but that it’s a “fact” that people usually state as a truism. BUT s/he didn’t believe it, because in fact, skimming was something RyJae does more as vanilla town than as power role or scum/independent.

S/he goes on to say that s/he was initially falling for the whole “Skimming = scum” to the point where even Babale’s apparent slip made RyJae’s spideysense tingle, but then remembered, “wait, no, that’s something I do when I’m vanilla town. Stop believing cliches when you know yourself they’re false, self!”

So I don’t see that as a slip the way others have. Again, I may just be parsing this differently from the rest of the RyJae voters. Thus I’m ignoring that particular argument.

Then there’s ATPG’s argument against RyJae from 505, which basically boils down to RyJae being nervous about voting to lynch on Day 1 because we have so little info that it’s likely we’ll hit a townie rather than scum, so RyJae is anti-Town because s/he cares too much about killing a townie.

Well, this may be a good point. I admit myself I hate D1 with a passion, though; it’s so scattershot and self-referential and meta and round-and-round-the-mulberry-bush-we-go where people overanalyze the absolute minutiae in order to justify their votes. (Which is kinda why “pancakes” is such a great answer, because that really does describe why most people are voting on D1. :D) I really don’t know if my dislike of this is due to being a relative newbie and thus not having a taste for the jugular that other players do, and so even a 'nilla townie’s life is precious to me because I haven’t really owned the fact that vanillas are basically expendable… at least, as much as anyone is in this game who isn’t scum.

Since I don’t know if RyJae is like me, it’s hard for me to justify voting for someone who feels the same way I do. If I knew more about RyJae’s history–yes, here’s where knowing someone’s history is useful–I might be able to make this judgment call. But I’d just find it hypocritical to ding him/her for feeling as I do.

Ultimately, the question is, is it anti-Town to advocate lynching nobody on D1? Possibly. Obviously it does put us at a disadvantage because it’s sure as hell that the Werewolves will attack at Night and they certainly won’t have any bleedin’ debate or ethical conundrum about doing so. So lynching someone on D1 is the only chance we have of a level playing field, even if it’s purely by chance if we hit a scum on the first try, and even if we do risk hitting a vanilla or, much worse, a power role.

I guess all this is me saying… I just don’t know. I can understand why people are voting for RyJae, but I’m not entirely sure why so many are. There just isn’t enough there there. Maybe I empathize too much, I dunno. I don’t think there’s any sign of a wagoning, but I think there are better candidates and better arguments than the ones for RyJae. OTOH, if s/he’s scum, so be it, and yay. I will say that if RyJae is scum and gets lynched, I really think it’s more chance than skill that led this particular scum up to the gallows.

Although I am tempted to vote for RyJae for continually mangling my name as “chloie.” Now that is a total scum tell.

Okay, so that leaves Chucara, right?

Well… it seems that first people got on the case because Chucara either skimmed or didn’t quite grok the idea behind the Barn. Honestly? I can’t dun him/her for that; I don’t fully grok the idea behind the Barn. (I realize that I’m setting a very low standard here if I’m judging everybody by how I play, but still, barring my knowledge of their style, it’s all I can do.) And skimming, as mentioned above in the RyJae stuff above, really doesn’t feel like a scum tell even if that’s what Received Opinion says. The sole time I was Scum, I was super-analyzing everyone’s posts, even though I appeared not to, because I absolutely needed to keep track of everything and everybody. Then again, I was playing alone, and I didn’t have a team of Scum to back me up, so maybe this is a bad precedent to use. Just don’t know.

Next people leapt on Chucara for the whole “pancakes” deal. I’m sorry, but even if it causes people to wrap the rope around my neck and swing me up, I cannot vote a person who came up with the “pancakes” gambit. It’s too awesome. I realize this is a craptastic reason to trust anyone, but well, it’s the best I’ve got on D1.

More seriously, “pancakes” is obviously code for “an inkling but barely a rationalized one, or in other words, the same reason for voting as everyone else on D1.” That’s as good as we’ve got today (except my hugely rational voting, that is! :D).

I think some of jumped on the fact that Chucara hasn’t removed the vote on orthohedron despite not having a reason for it. I can’t argue with that. But if s/he truly thinks one random vote is as good as another on D1, then why should Chucara remove the vote? Admittedly s/he did remove the vote on Babale, but this unvote was explained as occuring due to Babale really feeling like Town. If Chucara doesn’t have that kind of instinct for ortho, then why remove the vote?

I can’t mistrust a guy or gal for voting randomly on D1. It’s part of what D1 is, and unlike many other votes, Chucara’s vote is honest about its randomness.

Annnnnd there you have it. Those are my thoughts on those two folks. Is there someone else I should be considering so far?

Since I last posted, to be honest ATPG is pinging me more lately, because the aggressive defensiveness feels off to me. I admit I am way less invested in this game than ATPG is, but since he’s claiming vanilla townie I don’t see why he’s getting this outraged at being in first or second place. Vanillas are redshirts. It’s part of the contract: redshirts who stand too close to that comm panel during a battle with the Romulans will get fried and die, unloved and unmourned, and frankly unnamed. So suck it up and accept your fate. It’s what I’d do. In my first and second games I was outraged. By now? I know what’s best for Town, and again, lynching a vanilla isn’t great but it’s the better option of lynching a power role.

If, in fact, you are vanilla town. :dubious:

I don’t get the case on pizza at all. Pizza didn’t slip anything and I think his plan is no indicator of scum or town. I think he was going to try to implement the plan in this game not matter what he would be. At least once we found out we were getting a super long Day 1.

I have zero read on him either way, so not vote for him.

Massively snipped and bolding mine:

Yep, I am sticking with my vote for Chacura. This looks an awful like scum struggling to find another target, any target. He is defending Pizza with both barrels. A lot of wine there…it could be to also save his scum buddy Pizza, or it could be to take Pizza down with him.

OMGUS vote:** vote: Guiri** for voting me and for stalking Choie. :wink:

TexCat: Please reread my posts. There are no inconsistencies in them.

  • I know I am town
  • I think Pizza is town
  • I have no lean on RyJae (“I don’t think he is particularly scummy”, yet I think he is more likely to be scum than myself and Pizza)
  • Ortho is not one of the top three candidates.

I’d prefer not to lynch myself or Pizza, and have voted accordingly. If pizza is scum, I will wear a hat and stand in a corner. I can promise you that if I were scum and pizza was on the block, I would not rush to his defense in this manner.

But I agree, this Chacura guy sounds scummy :stuck_out_tongue:

So, starting with my question to pizza based on their interesting statement:

We got this response:

And then Astral points out:

We get this response:

In summary, pizza says that if we do not lynch a player ToDay, we should expect two dead townies ToMorrow. Then, when questioned about, explains why we should expect one dead townie and insults me. And when called on that, retracts the insult, but still no explanation of where the second dead townie comes from.

pizza, you have some stupid votes* on you. But when someone points out what looks like a privileged information slip, instead of giving a plausible reason why a townie might say that, you react very differently. Your evasiveness does not seem townie to me.

*Let’s look at the votes on pizza
choie (312): getting “scum vibes”
texcat (334): voting because of your “disturbance in the force” vote
Silver Jan (351): voting because of your “no reason at all” vote
Johnny Bravo (392): says your “pinging scummish”
RyJae (508): for a “vote on scum chance”
Astral Rejection (514): has a list of reasons supporting a “moderate scum lean”
orthohedron (524): because you’re “trying to deflect the heat”
USCDiver (544): because your “post is so much fucking horseshit”
Dizzymrslizzy (546): because you “didn’t answer my question”
Pleonast (557): because of an apparent PIS

The votes by choie, Johnny and RyJae are weak and barely defensible. Hunches are valid reasons for votes, but not very useful to anyone. It’s very easy for scum to justify a vote this way.

The votes by tex and Jan are also good because it’s useful to call players on weak votes.

Astral has the best vote on you.

USC’s vote seems to be because of a difference in play style. This is a poor vote.

ortho’s vote looks like an OMGUS. This is a poor vote.

The votes by lizzy and Pleo are because of your poor responses to our questions. Yeah, you don’t have to answer any question, but we don’t have to unvote you if we don’t like your responses. These are good votes.

I doubt you can change the minds (and votes) of some players, but others might. Throwing insults at players that ask you questions is probably not a good way to do it.

Guiri, seeing as you have voted for choie, Texcat and myself for no other reason than a couple of comments posted that didn’t actually say much, if one of us flip Town would that clear all of us? Other people have had a lot more to say to each other and you don’t jump all over them. Surely if I was scum then I could have asked Texcat a question on the scum board? Your votes really don’t make any sense to me. The link is tenuous at best and I am starting to think you look very scummy.

Jan, I’m a bit suspicious of how defensive you are when you’re in exactly zero lynch danger.

URL=http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=15947281&postcount=554] From this post

Can someone tell me what the TL;DR represents?
Your ‘defense’? of ** Pizza ** is puzzling me here-
It’s Day1 you would not have an investigation yet- are you claiming Masonry? Or are you posting a gut feeling without qualifying it as such?

What an odd question. I can’t imagine that you would expect **Guiri **to answer “yes” to this question, so why did you bother to ask it?

And to echo Astral, why are you so worked up about it? Your chance of being lynched Today is only marginally more than zero (inasmuch as the Day isn’t over yet). Why do you care so much about a single vote?

I’m not worked up about it, Guiri has just made a case out of thin air. I wouldn’t expect Guiri to answer yes, it was rhetorical but he has lumped the 3 of us together as scum. BTW, what’s wrong with trying to defend my actions and really not liking a vote on me? Don’t answer, that was rhetorical too.

I think he’s telling us that it’s simply a gut feeling; he thinks **Pizza **is Town, so we shouldn’t lynch him.

Here’s the post in question in its entirety, because rereading it I have some comments to make…

Chucara,

First of all, you are’t the lynch leader (and you weren’t at the time you made that post, either). We’re currently on track to lynch Pizza, with **RyJae **currently in second place.
Second, pancakes (and syrup). You freely admit that your vote on **orthohedron **was a joke. The only substantial comment you’ve made about him since is

Please explain why you would expect someone to comment on what was obviously a joke vote? What kind of response were you looking for…“green eggs and ham”? You say he’s still your “best bet”, and that “it stays a guess”. Are you honestly saying that after almost 600 posts, you haven’t found a single thing about a single player that’s better than “a guess”?
And third, because Mafia tends to bring out my OCD just a bit, I do have a list of players by post count, excluding signups. I won’t guarantee it’s 100% accurate, since it’s compiled by going through the thread post-by-post, but it’s pretty darn close. Through Post 589, I have

58 Askthepizzaguy
41 Astral Rejection
38 CometotheDarkSideWeHaveCookies
27 Johnny Bravo
26 Lightfoot
25 USCDiver
17 Enderw24
17 fubbleskag
16 Meeko
14 Chucara
14 Mahaloth
12 GuiriEnEspana
12 Pleonast
11 Suburban Plankton
10 Babale
10 orthohedron
9 Silver Jan
9 Stanislaus
8 Dizzymrslizzy
8 RyJae
8 TexCat
7 wombat99
6 choie
6 DiggitCamara
4 RedSkeezix
2 gnarlycharly
2 Val Salva

So now you can stop being lazy and vote for whomever you think it most deserving.
I wasn’t planning to do this when I started writing this post, but after reviewing things, I have to
vote Chucara
because bacon, sausage, and a cup o’ joe.

I really did not think I had posted that much. Of course, this post doesn’t help matters! :smiley:

Thanks for doing this. I was considering doing the exact same thing. When you say “excluding signups,” do you mean all posts prior to storyteller’s Day 1 post, or are you using a different cutoff?

NETA: By the way, you don’t have to go through the entire thread. If you click on the number of replies next to the thread title in the “The Game Room” forum, it’ll show you the total counts for the thread. Then you just have to subtract the “pregame” posts for each player.

Just to put it out there, here are the current totalposts, not including this one:

Askthepizzaguy 64
Astral Rejection 59
ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies 44
USCDiver 34
Johnny Bravo 33
LightFoot 32
Meeko 31
storyteller0910 29
Enderw24 26
fubbleskag 21
Suburban Plankton 20
Chucara 19
Pleonast 18
Mahaloth 17
Babale 15
GuiriEnEspaña 14
orthohedron 14
Stanislaus 13
Silver Jan 13
TexCat 11
RyJae 10
Dizzymrslizzy 9
wombat99 9
DiggitCamara 8
choie 7
Red Skeezix 6
gnarlycharlie 6
Val Salva 5
MHaye 2
Weedy 2
Chronos 2

I’ve lumped you together because I’m suspicious of choie but you and texcat have both come to her defense and snuggled her so I’m suspicious of you by association. When I took a look at your posts my suspicions just grew - call it gut if you like, something is off and I don’t think you’re town. I did explain this in my vote post.

If choie flipped town, I’d be mighty surprised and, like any flip, it would certainly make me reconsider my suspicion of you and TexCat but not clear you, no.

You weren’t defending your actions, I’m not sure what your intent was but it sure looks like you know one of the other two is town and my single vote has struck a nerve.

I don’t believe you are intentionally misconstruing my posts to such an extent so I’m assuming you’re simply really angry with me and reading my posts through a filter, and I can understand how much it must suck to be called out as scum even before you’ve posted, especially if you are scum. But hey, that was a poke, there’s no way on earth you can consider that post a smudge, unless you’ve got a really guilty conscience. And your lack of confirmation didn’t earn you a vote, it was the fact that the poke worked but you had nothing more to contribute. Val Salva had confirmed, I was commenting on Johnny’s question about low participants and simply didn’t remember anything from ValSalva - not confirming is not a scum tell, never was, so if you’re voting me for forgetting that ValSalva had confirmed, fair enough, obviously I’m not paying 100% attention to the game. If you’re voting me for holding a double standard, re-read my posts.

As for Chucara, the question wasn’t about the validity of meta gaming and comparing a person’s play in this game to previous games, he specifically said he needed more time to decide who to nominate because be wasn’t familiar with the players - as if meta gaming was the sole reason for making a nomination - and used that as an excuse not to nominate: “I haven’t played with many of you long enough to know who to nominate just yet”, I questioned this assertion.

To be fair, I clarified my position in Post 564 when I said

I think espousing Anti-Town ideas is reason enough for a Day 1 vote, don’t you? Much better than ‘pancakes’ anyway.

And now you are reading things into my posts that are not there. I do know that one of the 3 is Town, me, as for Tex and choie, I don’t have a clue. Mountains and molehills come to mind but do what you need to do.

Ah, thanks for pointing out your clarification; I somehow missed it.

To answer your question: no. Voting a player for espousing ideas is worse than voting for no reason at all. At least a no-reason vote is obvious.

But voting players for their ideas discourages discussing by making many players more cautious about what they say. And in a game based on discussion, actions which discourage it very anti-town. So while it’s very useful to point out problems with players’ ideas, voting them is bad.

I think your clarification makes me move your vote from poor to scummy.
vote USCDiver
for voting a player for their ideas.

Well, I somehow don’t think my vote is going to in any way discourage pizza from posting ideas! But if I can’t vote for someone for being anti-town that will really put a hamper on my already admittedly bad Mafia skills!